Uncle Davey wrote:
> "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1105210259.545030.208080@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
< snip >
> > > > Oh, I don't consider myself a victim, Davey, I was simply
stating a
> > > > limitation that I have because of my CHOSEN method of newsgroup
> > > > participation.
> > > >
> > > > Google suits me fine.
> > > >
> > > > < snip >
> > >
> > > Backpeddling. You just said it didn't let you post all you
wanted.
> >
> > Oh, dear.
> >
> > You're such a TERRIBLE linguist, Davey, that you can't parse simple
> > English.
> >
> > Here's what I "said:"
> >
> > "Google only allows so many posts in a time period that I have been
> > unable to determine."
> >
> > It pretty much usually allows me to post all I want, but if we
can't
> > get to the chase soon enough because of your stalling, equivocation
and
> > dilatory commentary, we might have to pick it up later, which is
ALSO
> > just fine with me.
>
> More backpeddling. If it allowed you to post all you want, you
wouldn't even
> have noticed it, much less whined about it.
Oh, my.
So an observation of a limit within I must work is a "whine?"
I think you confuse "what I want" with "as much as I am able in a
certain period of time," Davey.
But it's obvious that the level of your argumentation and your intent
to divert from the issues at hand is a paramount importance to you
right now, so have it your way.
I'm backpedalling.
I'm whining.
Those among us who actually give these things some thought will see
that those things aren't true.
> > I'll decide my points, Davey. You have a hard enough time
explaining
> > your own.
> >
> > > I never heard such losertalk.
> >
> > Oh, don't be bashful, Davey! SURE you have!
> > Shucks, you've engaged in some of it yourself.
>
> Beside your whines, mine pale into insignificance.
Really!
How so, Davey?
All I said was that I had to work within certain limits and suggested
that you give me something substantive to answer.
Your tactics in response are rather transparent.
> I think you are a major exporter of premium Californian whines.
That would be fine if I was in California in more than a "virutal"
sense, even if it is an old play on the word.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
|