Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Question to Marky Bilbo
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:51:13 +0100
Organization: www.usenetposts.com
Lines: 143
Message-ID: <crlt7g$1o8$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <crhca3$7vt$0@pita.alt.net><crkh8f$ihd$0@pita.alt.net> <1105056920.714028.103250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <OtidnTckXPaJQEDcRVn-qA@megapath.net> <1105059921.200466.18660@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <sdCdnYp2hLSjkEPcRVn-jQ@megapath.net> <crlkeg$7tb$0@pita.alt.net> <1105092804.158725.185460@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3734
Uzytkownik "David" <hdsienkiewicz@yahoo.com> napisal w wiadomosci
news:1105092804.158725.185460@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Uncle Davey wrote:
> > Uzytkownik "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> napisal w
> wiadomosci
> > news:sdCdnYp2hLSjkEPcRVn-jQ@megapath.net...
> > > In our last episode
> > > <1105059921.200466.18660@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, David lept
> out of
> > > the bushes shouting:
> > >
> > > > Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
> > > >> In our last episode
> > > >> <1105056920.714028.103250@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, David
> lept
> > > > out of
> > > >> the bushes shouting:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Uncle Davey wrote:
> > > >> >> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> > > >> >> news:crhca3$7vt$0@pita.alt.net...
> > > >> >> > How come everybody leaps out of bushes shouting with you?
> Is
> > > > this
> > > >> > some
> > > >> >> kind
> > > >> >> > of wierd fetish?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Uncle Davey
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> No answer, huh?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Oh, Davey, sorry, I forgot.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I don't think Mark reads either your vanity group or
> > > > free.christians -
> > > >> > unless it happens to cross-post into alt.atheism. Your
> question
> > > > wasn't
> > > >> > posted there.
> > > >>
> > > >> Actually I'm (temporarily) in f.c. since it was called to my
> > > > attention
> > > >> Gasbag was trying to cast spells on me or something. Mostly just
> > > > passing
> > > >> through.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, I sit corrected, then.
> > > >
> > > >> If you happen to care to, you could maybe explain to Uncle Dorky
> what
> > > > a
> > > >> "killfile" is...
> > > >
> > > > Oh, he knows.
> > >
> > > Ah, good. Then he can stop wasting his time posting to me.
> > >
> > > >> (WHY does something called alt.fan.uncle-davey exist and just
> how
> > > > pathetic
> > > >> does someone have to be to get such a ng... did *he create it?)
> > > >
> > > > Well, he says he didn't.
> > > >
> > > >> (Never mind, I probably don't really wanna know)
> > > >
> > > > I've never been clear on it, myself.
> > >
> > > I thought about looking it up but the "new and improved" Google
> groups is
> > > *crap. I poked around some in alt.config and alt.control and from
> what I
> > > could squeeze out the garbage of Google's new bastardization of
> Usenet is
> > > that someone else did do it to him.
> > >
> > > How *insulting. I'd be pissed if people tried to do that to me.
> >
> > If you had fans you'd probably be like those stuck up celebrities
> that
> > ignore their fans' existence, don't acknowledge their fan clubs and
> don't
> > sign autographs, and tell them you'd like to eat/shop/walk down the
> street
> > in peace.
>
> Oh, dear.
>
> Do you think you have "fans," Davey?
>
> It must be that stature thing you've talked about, eh?
>
> > But don't worry, I'm speaking of things w h i c h a r e r e
> m
> > o t e .
> >
> > Where I come from it is polite to be grateful and acknowledge things
> done by
> > people which they intend as an accolade to you. It is considered
> snooty to
> > respond to such things with your nose in the air.
>
> Well, frankly, Davey, I never bought your "explanation" for the
> creation of the group.
Well, all I can do is tell you the truth, which is what I have done. If you
don't believe it, that's not my problem, and is unlikely to cause you in
this case any problems either.
So believe what you like about it.
>
> Traditionally, the creation of an alt.fan. group for a Usenet persona
> was a means of ridicule.
That may be so, and I do take it as a bit of a joke against myself, but the
person who did it apparently didn't mean it that way, and the funny thing is
really the way it pinkles certain people off.
>
> > And you still haven't answered my question.
>
> First you have to tell him why it interests you.
It interests me because it is a lie. Very few people here are jumping out of
bushes and shouting when we post, and yet he claims that we are, so it
appears he is being economical with the truth, and trying to paint everyone
in a bad light.
>
> Or is Jason the only one who gets to use THAT one - and you, too, on
> his behalf?
No, no. Level playing field, all the way.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
|