Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Jesus Christ Saves Ministries
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:43:37 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: www.usenetposts.com
Lines: 267
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <c58fm3$m4l$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <bc03fd9b.0404052349.76a7ef6f@posting.google.com> <h3k970pnhhntfutnutumrlc1qo4hflq09d@4ax.com> <c53gae$hke$3@pita.alt.net> <jAedc.8$Nr3.4@twister.socal.rr.com> <c54ahl$erb$0@pita.alt.net> <slrnc7bc0o.1h4.mightymartianca@alder.alberni.net> <c54ciq$iku$0@pita.alt.net> <unjdc.5085$BR1.293@okepread03> <c54jj0$jo$0@pita.alt.net> <JDkdc.5110$BR1.531@okepread03> <rGndc.1371$l75.56@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> <X7odc.5154$BR1.26@okepread03> <c5606i$edj$0@pita.alt.net> <dc55e47f.0404091106.6c5f206a@posting.google.com> <c56u9v$q9$0@pita.alt.net> <h5Ddc.6118$BR1.5671@okepread03> <c5764q$qlq$0@pita.alt.net> <407730b0$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1081590217 48168 128.100.83.246 (10 Apr 2004 09:43:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 09:43:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:3126
>
>
> Uncle Davey wrote:
>
> > news:h5Ddc.6118$BR1.5671@okepread03...
> >
> >>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> >>news:c56u9v$q9$0@pita.alt.net...
> >>
> >>>Uzytkownik "Frank Pericope" <frank.pericope@oneimage.com> napisal w
> >>>wiadomosci news:dc55e47f.0404091106.6c5f206a@posting.google.com...
> >>>
> >>>>"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> >>>
> >>>news:<c5606i$edj$0@pita.alt.net>...
> >>>
> >>>><snip for brevity>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I don't have issues with women, I have issues with jumped up little
> >>>
> >>>brats.
> >>>
> >>>>Davey, anyone who reviews your posts knows you have issues with women.
> >>>>For one relatively tame example:
> >>>>
> >>>>"Just fuck a lot of women before you settle down with one you like,
> >>>>have her for a mistress for a year before you move in with her, then
> >>>>just live with her for a few years before you marry.
> >>>>
> >>>>"Only when you know someone's character, which takes a long time, can
> >>>>you really afford to be tied to them. I wish I'd really understood
> >>>>that when I was still in me twenties.
> >>>>
> >>>>"Uncle Davey"
> >>>>@http://tinyurl.com/3xrns
> >>>>
> >>>>Trust me, you *do* have issues with women.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I don't see Poland, for your information, as having any oppresion of
> >>>
> >>>women.
> >>>
> >>>>The prostitutes you visited there for "blow jobs" a few years back
> >>>>were all there for the fun of it?
> >>>>
> >>>><snip>
> >>>>
> >>>>>People like yourself and Grotty, economic migrants to richer nations
> >>
> >>who
> >>
> >>>>>want to be parasites and bloodsuck off of the labours of people who
> >>
> >>have
> >>
> >>>>>done all the real work before you get there will NEVER understand my
> >>>>>mentality, which is the opposite. I go to Russia and Poland to
> >
> > improve
> >
> >>>>>matters there,
> >>>>
> >>>>...And occasionally have some extramarital professional sex...
> >>>>
> >>>><snip>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Polish women have a culture and a bearing that UK women seem to
> >
> > lack,
> >
> >>>that
> >>>
> >>>>>much is true, but to state that they are any less assertive than UK
> >>>
> >>>women
> >>>
> >>>>>would be totally inaccurate.
> >>>>
> >>>>But how do they compare price-wise, Davey?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I also have very good working relationships with the female
> >
> > colleagues
> >
> >>>in my
> >>>
> >>>>>office, and have developed careers of as many females as males and
> >
> > on
> >
> >>>>>precisely the same principles.
> >>>>
> >>>>Sex for money?
> >>>>
> >>>>I am arguing as tough with you as I would
> >>>>
> >>>>>with a man on the same basis, but you seem to think I'm anti-woman
> >>>
> >>>because I
> >>>
> >>>>>am not giving you any leeway.
> >>>>
> >>>>I think you're anti-woman because 1) you've demonstrated it repeatedly
> >>>>in your posting history and 2) your insults against Anastastasia were
> >>>>often gender-specific, which is rare for your insults to men.
> >>>>
> >>>>You people of american culture seem to think
> >>>>
> >>>>>giving people a kind of golf handicap for being female or for being
> >>>
> >>>black or
> >>>
> >>>>>whatever is the way to treat them as equals.
> >>>>
> >>>>If you limited your sin to gender-neutral profanity, we might believe
> >>>>you. But you have no integrity to speak of here, so no one simply
> >>>>takes your word for it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well I never understood that, I
> >>>>
> >>>>>don't have affirmative actions in my Usenet posting, so I will be as
> >>>
> >>>tough
> >>>
> >>>>>on you as I would be with a man posting, and I suggest you live with
> >>
> >>it,
> >>
> >>>and
> >>>
> >>>>>don't bleat on about some pretended inequality.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Uncle Davey
> >>>>
> >>>>You've exposed yourself too often and for too long on Usenet to deny
> >>>>your nature. Please stop; you're only making it worse.
> >>>>
> >>>>- F.
> >>>
> >>>Stop denying that I used to do prostitutes?
> >>>
> >>>Never have denied it.
> >>
> >> After reading Mr Periscope's comments, I could not help but wonder
> >
> > how
> >
> >>you would respond. I predicted to myself that you would avoid the
point,
> >>and you have.
> >> Do you ever do anything honestly, Renfield?
> >>
> >>
> >>>I used to do prostitutes. I used to do a lot of things I don't know how
> >
> > I
> >
> >>>got away with.
> >>>
> >>>Nevertheless, that is not the issue here.
> >>
> >> No, it is not. What is going on is more general than specific use
of
> >>prostitutes and exploitation of women soley for your own pleasure.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Whatever I think about Anastasia, I don't imagine for one moment that
> >
> > she
> >
> >>is
> >>
> >>>a prostitute.
> >>
> >> But even though you cannot be bothered with me, you seem to want
to
> >>spend some more time talking about me.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Suggesting that I preferred women at work if they gave me sexual
> >
> > favours,
> >
> >>as
> >>
> >>>you do at one point above, is also wide of the mark. I have done a lot
> >
> > of
> >
> >>>bad things but I never preferred someone in the workplace just because
> >>
> >>they
> >>
> >>>gave me a sexual favour. To the three women in my history that I have
> >
> > had
> >
> >>as
> >>
> >>>subordinates who did have sex with me, it didn't make the slightest
> >
> > career
> >
> >>>difference to them, good or bad.
> >>
> >> We have only your word on this, Renfield. Unfortunately, that does
> >
> > not
> >
> >>count for much.
> >>
> >>
> >>>And as you know I stopped all that malarkey long ago.
> >>
> >> I would suggest that we do not know that at all.
> >>
> >>
> >>>I obviously wasn't
> >>>evangelising either in those dark days, I was very backslidden indeed.
> >>
> >> Is the idea that you 'evangelise' supposed to have merit in this
> >>argument? Of course not, Renfield! It is meaningless. Ask Mrs Jimmy
> >>Swaggart or Mrs Jim Bakker.
> >>
> >>
> >>>It was the love of Yelena that stopped all that. My religion was in
fact
> >>
> >>not
> >>
> >>>strong enough to win through there, as I was addicted to easy sex, but
> >
> > my
> >
> >>>love of her got me out of it, and I consider that a gift of help from
> >
> > God.
> >
> >> If this is so, you have my congratulations. But how do we know
that
> >
> > it
> >
> >>is not a lie, Renfield?
> >> Regardless, if your personality is anything as we see in Usenet,
she
> >>must be an exceptional woman to put up with you.
> >
> >
> > She's an angel in human form.
> >
>
>
> I won't ask the obvious question . . . . . . . . . . . .
I'll admit I laughed.
Uncle Davey, no she doesn't have one.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 |
|