On 3 Mar 2004 20:44:54 -0800, rogue719@hotmail.com (rogue) wrote:
>"Jason Gastrich" <newsgroups@jcsm.org> wrote in message news:<oWq1c.13357$4o3.7763@twister.socal.rr.com>...
>
>> >DAVEY
>> > Quite frankly, I don't understand why they need marriage.
>> >
>> > Many heterosexual couples are opting not to formalise their unions in
>> > the eyes of the state, and of course they are married in the sight of
>> > God as soon as they become one flesh anyway.
>> >
>> > They are married even though they are not married in the eyes of the
>> > state.
>> >
>> > Homosexuals, even if they become married in the eyes of the state,
>> > are not able to become married in the eyes of God, because God has
>> > only made marriage possible between a man and a woman. All a man can
>> > become with another man is a worse sinner than he was before.
>> >
>> > Uncle Davey
>> JASON
>> I understand what you're saying, Davey. You and I know that marriage is a
>> covenant between humans and God. Some have forgotten, though.
>
>JERRY
>I understand what you are saying, Jason, but some people seem to have
>forgotten that this is not a Christian nation but a melting pot where
>there is a separation of church and state, therefore your belief in
>marriage as a covenant with god and humans is a speech for your church
>and has no bearing on the civil rights of the citizens of the US.
BB:
Jerry, that melting pot you refer to is made up fromall the nations of
the world that hold that marriage is between a man and a woman. It
may be a religious issues in some cultures, but not necessarily all;
but all the cultures agree that mariage is betweeen a man and a woman.
BB
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 |
|