news:bnuobg$14ofjp$2@ID-75234.news.uni-berlin.de...
> In alt.politics.homosexuality Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org>
wrote:
> >> But seriously, it was more than that. They were specially made for each
> >> other. Their union reflected something of God Himself. Their different
> >> capacities, completing each other. And the whole thing with the
> >> different sexual organs, doesn't that tell you that man and man or
woman
> >> and woman were not made to be together?
> > No, it doesn't.
>
> Especially given that the whole "woman" thingie wasn't created until
> after the "man" thingie got bored and started whining a lot. Thus,
> the idea of man-and-woman is a HUMAN idea, not a divine one.
>
> > It tells me that a man and woman CAN be together for the
> > purpose of making babies, but it does not tell me that that is the only
> > way for people to be. Besides, homosexual couples have different
> > capacities that complete each other, as well.
You keep telling yourself that.
Uncle Davey, but God has other ideas.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 |
|