Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "\"Rev Dr\" Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: So few Jewish creationists ? why?
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:53:45 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.
Lines: 180
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <403e8819$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>
References: <c0ij7u$hvq$1@ousrvr3.oulu.fi> <c0iuo7$l8o$0@pita.alt.net> <402d78cf$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c0kef8$85t@library2.airnews.net> <402e1d8a$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c0lhkh$mrt$0@pita.alt.net> <402e9693_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c0mcbm$t75$0@pita.alt.net> <403608ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <c153rf$5tn$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1077839625 28186 128.100.83.246 (26 Feb 2004 23:53:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:53:45 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <c153rf$5tn$0@pita.alt.net>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2004 23:58:19.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[68A66230:01C3FCC4]
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox3.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Dec 3 2003 15:07:19, 0.0/5.0 2.63)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 62537 i1QNwJvZ079528 mailbox3.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2780
Uncle Davey wrote:
>
>>
>>Uncle Davey wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Uncle Davey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Dale wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why the hostility Rev. Dr. Flank? I realize there's some kind of
>>>
>>>hostile
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>history between you and Uncle Davey, but this particular analysis
>
> seems
>
>>>>>more
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>like dispassionate observation than raving fundie opinion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>His dispassionate observations are no more authoritative than anyone
>>>>>>else's, since he doesn't know any more about God than anyone else
>
> does.
>
>>>>>>He is not God's Messenger, he is not God's Spokesman, and he doesn 't
>>>>>>speak on behalf of God. He's nothing but a plain old ordinary human
>>>>>>beign who shits the same way that the rest of us do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't like self-righteous prideful arrogant pricks who think they
>
> are
>
>>>>>>holier than everyone else. Nor do I like lying attention-craving
>>>>>>pathological liars who are addicted to trolling and sockpuppets. Nor
>
> do
>
>>>>>>I like fundies who lie and evade simple direct questions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>As Dale correctly observes I _was_ answering a simple direct question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And *I* was asking why your answer is any more authoritative than
>>>>anybody else's. And if it's NOT any more authoritative, then why should
>>>>anyone give a flying fuck about your answers, Davey.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>So far I have answered every one of your questions except for the coral
>>>
>>>one,
>>>
>>>
>>>>>and you are in denial about that simple direct fact.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And the reason I should accept the authority of your "answers" is what,
>>>>exactly. How the hell do you know whether nephilim have cocks, Davey.
>>>>You want me to take Bible Bob's word for it? How the hell does HE know,
>>>>Davey.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Is there any reason at all why anyone should accept any of your
>>>>religious opinions as valid, other than your say-so?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>You could say the same about the world views of your evolutionist
>
> colleagues
>
>>>here, but I see you don't.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>That's because my "evolutionist" colleagues have this stuff they call
>>"data" and "evidence", and a process they use called the "scientific
>>method" which allows everyone to test who is right and who is wrong.
>>
>>
>>Please feel entirely free to give me any "data" or "evidence" and any
>>method or process which we can use to determine whether or not any of
>>your religious opinions are valid. Other than your holy say-so. What
>>data or evdiecne do you have to idnicate whether or not angels have
>>cocks, Davey. What experiment or test can we use to determine whether
>>or not angels have cocks, Davey. Put up or shut up, Davey.
>>
>>
>
>
> The problem you would have on an evidential basis is not what they have in
> the way of organs but whether they even exist at all, since nobody has
> observed them under lab conditions.
Then how do you know they don't have cocks, Davey. Other than your holy
say-so.
First overcome the problem science has
> with that, and then the other matter shouldn't be so hard to overcome.
>
OK, so --as I suspected -- you HAVE NO method or process which we can
use to determine whether or not any of your religious opinions are
valid, other than your holy-say-so. None at all.
And since you are a known demonstrated liar, your holy say-so doesn't
mean shit.
Right?
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 |
|