| Re: So atheism isn't a religion, after all, then. |
http://groups.google.com |
| Mitch Alsup (MitchAlsup@aol.com) |
2004/02/24 15:03 |
Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: MitchAlsup@aol.com (Mitch Alsup)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: So atheism isn't a religion, after all, then.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:03:58 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 9
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <e90782f7.0402241408.36d315a1@posting.google.com>
References: <1035be0pogo6f2f@corp.supernews.com> <23256-4032B3CA-18@storefull-3258.bay.webtv.net> <2b68957a.0402180251.7a34c624@posting.google.com> <c0vmd3$tgn$0@pita.alt.net> <c1fn75$1i838n$1@ID-87341.news.uni-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1077660238 71030 128.100.83.246 (24 Feb 2004 22:03:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:03:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.181.251.9
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:2713
"Thore Schmechtig" <WRITETOcommoner@carcosa.de> wrote in message news:<c1fn75$1i838n$1@ID-87341.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> > > Wrong of course. Even if someone promotes atheism fanatically, there's
> > > still no deity involved.
> > Who said all religions need a deity?
>
> The very definition of the term "religion", Watson.
>
I disagree, Budhism has no deity, as an example.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|
|