Uncle Davey wrote:
> Uzytkownik "Snowbird" <snowbirdRemoveThis@ThisToosnowbird.freeserve.co.uk>
> napisal w wiadomosci news:enu_b.9679$h44.1082846@stones.force9.net...
>
>>Uncle Davey wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Uzytkownik "Snowbird"
>
> <snowbirdRemoveThis@ThisToosnowbird.freeserve.co.uk>
>
>>>napisal w wiadomosci news:R_m_b.9265$h44.1063002@stones.force9.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Uncle Davey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>news:RqGdnVzcyvkLzbPd4p2dnA@comcast.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Ariaan" wrote...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>waitaminute, -YOU'VE- got evidence for a global flood! Quick, before
>>>>>>>>the atheistic conspiracy gets to you TELL THE WORLD what the
>
> evidence
>
>>>>>>>>is...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>No worries. I've put it in a safe somewhere with the key a letter at
>>>>>>>my lawyer's telling him to immediately open it and publish its
>>>>>>>contents the moment I die suspiciously. And if I seem to have died a
>>>>>>>natural death, he is to wait five weeks and then publish it anywho.
>>>>>>>But while I'm alive the secret is safe. So I'd say I've got my rear
>>>>>>>end covered pretty well. Hey, and perhaps the atheist movement will
>>>>>>>pay for my hospital bills now, eh? After all, they've got nothing to
>>>>>>>gain and everything to lose by my death.
>>>>>>>Heh heh heh!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ariaan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then again if you release this evidence how many people would regain
>
> the
>
>>>>>>faith they lost in the Bible? Alright....hand it over!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>With evidence, faith isn't faith.
>>>>
>>>>Then why not accept evolution, which is not evidence of God (just like
>>>>gravity isn't) and reject creationism, which claims to have evidence of
>>>>God?
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm a creationist, and I don't claim to have evidence that proves that
>>>evolution to be wrong.
>>>
>>>Had the earth not been made mature 10,000 years ago, it might well have
>>>taken evolution and billions of years for us to get here. But that would
>>>obviate the direct involvement of the Creator God,
>>
>>No, God could still have created everything.
>>
>> > which is not the image of
>>
>>>origins which the scripture which also tells of a miraculous new
>
> creation in
>
>>>the resurrection, gives us.
>>
>>The resurrection has nothing to do with creationism. The image of origins
>>in the Bible also does not have to be taken literally for the message of
>>the resurrection to be true.
>>
>>-
>>Wayne
>>
>
>
> So, umm, what's your scientific theory of the resurrection, then?
I never claimed to have one. Nor did I claim that one was necessary.
-
Wayne
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
|