In talk.origins, "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in
<c1bequ$qdj$0@pita.alt.net>:
>
>news:eu6i301dqlm3lhc38tf65pr9gbqtoppokj@4ax.com...
>> In talk.origins, "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in
>> <c1b3u4$6fk$0@pita.alt.net>:
>> >
>> >news:qffc30lqnfrlh03qdipd5kvnghufiefknn@4ax.com...
>> >> In talk.origins, "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in
>> >> <c15bcr$j34$0@pita.alt.net>:
>> >> >
>> >> >news:1g9g6ej.vp33qh1x9ymufN%see.sig@for.addy...
>> >> >> Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > news:1g9fnp3.dp73mj12lpsucN%see.sig@for.addy...
>> >> >> > > Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > > In my opinion, a Biblical kind is
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > What do you mean "in your opinion"? Shouldn't this sentence
>start
>> >"It
>> >> >is
>> >> >> > > one of the basic results of creation science that a biblical
>kind
>> >is
>> >> >> > > .." ?
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I mean, this question has come up before, why don't you guys
>have a
>> >> >nice
>> >> >> > > consensus answer by now?
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > V.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Vic, for all I know there is one, and I just don't know about it.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm a freethinker, anyway, so consensus answers don't interest me
>> >much.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Uncle Davey
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You're not concerned with science, in other words.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> V.
>> >> >
>> >> >Not overly, no.
>> >> >
>> >> >I'm more concerned with faith.
>> >> >
>> >> >Uncle Davey
>> >>
>> >> How do proponents of faith justify the use of lies to attack the
>> >> discoveries of science? Do these lies enhance faith?
>> >>
>> >
>> >i don't attack what science has discovered, i attack what science
>> >extrapolates from it.
>>
>> The discoveries of science include the age of the universe, the age of
>> the earth, the length of time that life has existed on earth, and the
>> overwhelming evidence for common descent. I take it that you accept all
>> of these.
>>
>
>They are all extrapolations.
That is a false claim on your part.
Why not learn some science before making such comments.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 |
|