bitbucket55@hotmail.com (John Drayton) wrote in message news:<ce43f6e.0402160338.5397d8e4@posting.google.com>...
> Patrick James <patjames@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:<0001HW.BC55668A007AE939F02845B0@enews.newsguy.com>...
> > On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:12:10 -0500, AC wrote
> > (in message <slrnc2voad.1b0.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem>):
<snip>
> I read his little story about the Russian translator as
> an admission that he thinks the "lieing for God" that
> Phillip Johnson indulges in is acceptable because it
> counters the even greater "lie" of evolution.
>
> I could be wrong, but I can see no other purpose or point
> to the story otherwise.
>
> He could just come out and and say where he stands:
> whether he thinks it is acceptable for a creationist to
> lie if the lie is in the service of discrediting evolution.
>
> I suspect he's too slippery and slimy to actually confirm
> or deny this, though.
I take this back, and quote from Davey himself:
Me:
> Is it OK to selectively quote from people to make them appear
> to support a position that the in fact do not support?
>
Uncle Davey:
Yes, because anyone who reads the authors for themselves can
soon see whether they support it or not.
The whole message is here: http://tinyurl.com/2duvw
Unlike Jason, he's at least been honest about *this*
--
John Drayton
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
|