>
>
> Uncle Davey wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Uncle Davey wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>If we are to believe that God will create the new world immediately, by
> >
> > a
> >
> >>>miracle,
> >>>then what's the problem with believing the first was also a rapid,
> >>>miraculous, direct Creation?
> >>>
> >>>Especially when the new world promise comes from the same Bible as the
> >
> > old
> >
> >>>world creation account.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Are you speaking for yourself, Davey, or are you once again under the
> >>delusion that you are God's Holy Messenger. . . . . ?
> >>
> >>Do I have to remind you yet again that you are not divine, not any more
> >>holy than anyone else, and that your religious opinions are no more
> >>authoritative than those of my car mechanic or the counter girl's at the
> >>local health food store?
> >>
> >>You tend to forget that at times. No need to thank me for reminding
you.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > I was making a comment in answer to questions as to why Jewish believers
can
> > more easily accept Creationism than Evangelical christians can.
> >
> > At the outset of making those comments, in the part you snipped, I said
it
> > was my opinion, but that it seemed to answer the question.
>
>
>
>
> OK. Just wanted to make sure that it's just your opinion, and your
> opinion is no more authoritative than mine or my next door neighbor's or
> my car mechanic's or my pizza delivery kid's. You are not God's
> Spokesman, you are not God's Messenger, you do not know any more about
> God than anyone else does, and there is no more reason for anyoien to
> pay any more attention to your religious opinions than anyone else's.
>
>
Well, you don't know if I'm God's spokesman or not, do you? Last I heard,
you were a Taoist.
>
> >
> > Instead of making some meritorical argument edealing with the point I
made,
> > you continue to harass with your insinuation that there is something
very
> > arrogant about me for even speaking on these matters.
>
>
>
>
> Yes, Davey, claiming to speak on behalf of God IS very arrogant. Very
> prideful and self-righteous, too. I hear it's a sin.
>
I answered a question about why Jews have less problems with evolution than
Evangelical Christians do.
I was speaking on behalf of such Evangelical Christians as happen to share
my view.
>
>
> >
> > If you don't want to speak on them, fine, but don't try to harrass other
> > people's freedom to speak of them without ad hominem insinuations.
> >
>
> I am not at all impacting your freedom to speak, Davey. You are
> entirely free to spout off as many of your religious opinions as you
> want, and I am doing not a single thing to stop or limit you.
>
> I am simply aksing why anyone should bother LISTENING to your religious
> opinions. And getting no answer at all.
>
>
I have given you the same answer again and again, which is don't listen if
you don't want to.
If you don't like what a TV channel is showing, would you write a letter to
them asking why they bought that series from Columbia pictures, or would you
just flick over to another one of the other 700 channels knowing that
someone, somewhere, actually wants to watch the twentieth re-run of The
Nanny.
If you don't want to subscribe to my opinions, then don't subscribe to them.
>
> > I am sorry that your Usenet debating method is so poor and pathetic when
you
> > are capable of much better. I will not thank you for that. I might thank
you
> > when you realise your potential.
> >
>
> Why don't you go pray about it, Davey.
You want me to pray for you Lenny? Okay.
An old friend of mine whose marriage partner I correctly prophesied after he
kept on telling me to prophesy and I didn't want to after he kept doing it
himself and getting it wrong used to say that when I prayed for him he'd
suddenly get the impression someone swiped his head with a big family Bible
with gothic letters in it.
But those days were long ago, and I have lost my first love.
I can still pray for you, though, but you won't feel it physically now.
> Speaking of which, any word yet
> on the corals? Any word on how the nephilim were able to fuck earth
> women without cocks?
>
> Just can't give up that addiction, huh Davey. . . . . .
>
Bible Bob has explained it for you. He may have got the Trinity wrong, but
some other things he knows very well.
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |
| 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 |
|