Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: catshark <catshark@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: The Trinity of Deception - JG+UD+CV
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 01:14:06 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 78
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <c956101ot6hep92ohin2enhtt8djekkvvg@4ax.com>
References: <tldpvv4fvmju6gbk4j9ctrvdlbhj0q6k43@4ax.com> <btjpi3$na5$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <5auqvvovanbbokblmcrnemhb7a1oe2pru5@4ax.com> <slrnbvrrv5.1qs.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem> <b9b3de8.0401240414.78d07958@posting.google.com> <4t2510puqje0qaesmh08et4q7v8f3bpd03@4ax.com> <buukob$ong$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1074993246 42197 128.100.83.246 (25 Jan 2004 01:14:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 01:14:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Orig-NNTP-Posting-Host: ool-18baca73.dyn.optonline.net (24.186.202.115)
X-Orig-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1074993181 20433678 24.186.202.115 ([166390])
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1826
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:33:09 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
wrote:
>
>"catshark" <catshark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:4t2510puqje0qaesmh08et4q7v8f3bpd03@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 12:16:03 +0000 (UTC), branchofjesse@hotmail.com (Jerzy
>> Jakubowski) wrote:
>>
>> >AC <mightymartianca@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
>news:<slrnbvrrv5.1qs.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem>...
>> >> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:56:29 +0000 (UTC),
>> >> Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:25:48 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
>> >> ><noway@jose.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> <snip>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>By the way, don't blame Jason. He's not implicated at all.
>> >> >
>> >> > I blame Jason as much as I blame myself. We were both played for
>> >> > suckers and behaved as such. Jason is the victim because he trusted
>> >> > you more than anyone else. His association with you damaged his
>> >> > reputation. Your manipulation will only have short term effects.
>> >>
>> >> I'm not too sure "Dr." Gastrich's reputation could really be harmed by
>> >> anything Dave or his sockpuppets say. "Dr." Gastrich has shown himself
>as
>> >> much a liar as Dave.
>> >>
>> >> "Dr." Gastrich and Uncle Davey have both tarnished the name of
>Christianity.
>> >> I think Uncle Davey might just have enough smarts to figure out how is
>> >> behavior reflects upon his religion, and has at least made some effort
>> >> (though not enough for my liking) to apologize.
>> >
>> >
>> >What do you want, blood?
>> >
>> >When your side's Michael Clark apologised for post-forging, no less a
>> >crime than sockpuppetry, I immediately forgave him.
>>
>> And "our side's" Michael Clark engaged in a single instance of
>> inappropriate behavior while yours stretched over dozens of posts over
>> weeks if not months. But, no matter. AC didn't say he didn't accept your
>> apology, just that he wished the effort put into it was greater.
>>
>> Now, shall we talk about unmarked snips?
>
>Go on, let's talk about unmarked snips.
Fine. Don't do it . . . as you did here.
>
>Personally, I always try to mark my snippages.
>
>But then, I hardly ever edit the foregoing text anyway. I'm very bad at
>that. I confess before you even need to start hitting me.
I won't pretend I was being anything but a smartass here. Frankly, I pay
only occasional attention to your posts anymore (this one got me because of
a posting name I didn't recognize - I hope that doesn't mean you are
stating a "Darwin's Mistress"-like round of posting names) so I don't
really know if you are in the habit of unmarked snippage. I just noted it
in this case and thought it made it seem AC was more concerned about your
apology than with Jason's behavior.
---------------
J. Pieret
---------------
In the name of the bee
And of the butterfly
And of the breeze, amen
- Emily Dickinson -
|
|