Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Gill <ericvgill@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Evolution - Blind Heart Surgery
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:48:46 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com
Lines: 48
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <Xns947AAACC86676ericvgillyahoocom@24.93.43.121>
References: <laurieappieton-20040124035057.21792.00000635@mb-m06.aol.com> <Xns947A4B5CBF133cheezitsnetzeronet@129.250.170.83> <butoq1$4hq$0@pita.alt.net> <butqab$a2v$1@news6.svr.pol.co.uk> <buttes$csv$0@pita.alt.net> <Xns947A5DCE18BC0ericvgillyahoocom@24.93.43.121> <thm5105ind7aimbgpvso916tag2851i87h@4ax.com> <Xns947A8AA8360C3ericvgillyahoocom@24.93.44.119> <chq5109d7sb94c4vr308v0459u33utt8df@4ax.com> <Xns947A9BD5F8270ericvgillyahoocom@24.93.43.119> <buuvmq$cpc$0@pita.alt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1074991726 41816 128.100.83.246 (25 Jan 2004 00:48:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 00:48:46 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.69.150.142
X-Spam-Level: Level
X-Spamscanner: mailbox2.ucsd.edu (v1.4 Dec 3 2003 15:07:19, 0.4/5.0 2.60)
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 91544 i0P0lVts005285 mailbox2.ucsd.edu)
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1824
"Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in news:buuvmq$cpc$0@pita.alt.net:
>
> "Eric Gill" <ericvgill@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns947A9BD5F8270ericvgillyahoocom@24.93.43.119...
>> Severian <severian@chlamydia-is-not-a-flower.com> wrote in
>> news:chq5109d7sb94c4vr308v0459u33utt8df@4ax.com:
>>
>> > On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:38:53 +0000 (UTC), Eric Gill
>> > <ericvgill@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Severian <severian@chlamydia-is-not-a-flower.com> wrote in
>> >>news:thm5105ind7aimbgpvso916tag2851i87h@4ax.com:
>> >>
>> >>> Oy vey! While I have no inclination to agree with UD, your reply
>> >>> does seem rather anti-semetic.
>> >>
>> >>Uhm - why, exactly?
>> >><snip>
>> >
>> > You compared Yiddish epics to Klezmer symphonies, implying that
>> > because they are both Yiddish, they are both poorly done. However,
>> > I am not Jewish, and certainly not a Yiddish scholar, so I may not
>> > have understood your analogy.
>>
>> Ah.
>>
>> Well, no. The similarity is that both are more "everyday" forms of
>> communication/art, colorful and usually not too serious.
>>
>> I know very well there are exceptions. I really doubt Uncle Schmuck
>> knew
> as
>> much before you told him.
>>
>
> Don't confuse the beautiful and mysterious tones of the Jewish style
> on the clarinet with your littering the place with filthy
> perjoratives.
I wasn't speaking to you, Uncle Schmuck, and no one is likely to miss
that you are whining instead of actually defending your ill-advised
attempt to conflate lingual and biological evolution.
> You're just trying to spin your way out, now.
Hypocrite.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 |
|