On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
<noway@jose.com> wrote:
<snip>
>The Bible does not simply claim that. Read and analyse the whole passage.
>They did not cover the earth as had been commanded them. God said to the
>Flood remnant 'Prue u revue' which is 'Go 4th and * ' They did not prue and
>they did not revue. They sought to urbanise and we would have had twentieth
>century technology in no time had they managed it. They were running before
>they could walk, neither were they obedient to God and giving Him the glory.
>
>> And that this because the Tower would have been unacceptably tall?
>
>'reach the sky' is more than just a physical reaching.
So it's not a literal meaning. Interesting dodge.
>> How tall would the Tower of Babel have been if it had been completed?
>> (Note: I recommend you use the archaeological record to justify your
>> answer.)
>
>This is a mere irrelevance. Kindly posit a common ancestor of Indo European
>and Finno-Ugric.
That's even more irrelevant. The evolution of language is unrelated,
except by analogy, to the theory of evolution.
- Sev
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 |
|