Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Evolution - Blind Heart Surgery
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: International Riskyou
Lines: 61
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
Message-ID: <buuke4$o53$0@pita.alt.net>
References: <laurieappieton-20040124035057.21792.00000635@mb-m06.aol.com> <Xns947A4B5CBF133cheezitsnetzeronet@129.250.170.83> <butoq1$4hq$0@pita.alt.net> <7418dcc4.0401241026.5ed5e62@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1074976065 37328 128.100.83.246 (24 Jan 2004 20:27:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1795
"Ann Broomhead" <broomhed@world.std.com> wrote in message
news:7418dcc4.0401241026.5ed5e62@posting.google.com...
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:<butoq1$4hq$0@pita.alt.net>...
> > "Cheezits" <cheezits32@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns947A4B5CBF133cheezitsnetzeronet@129.250.170.83...
> > > laurieappieton@aol.com (LaurieAppIeton) won't even try to defend this
> > > nonsense, but let's have some fun with it anyway:
> > > > 1) no natural process which resulted in information forming
> > > > automatically in matter, has ever been observed;
> > >
> > > No act of divine creation has ever been observed.
> >
> > Oh yes it has, Sue. When God confounded the languages at Babel, humanity
was
> > able to observe it. That's why we were scattered all over the earth, and
we
> > speak languages whose families cannot possibly have a common ancestor.
> >
> > Uncle Davey
> > www.usenetpostes.com
>
> Oh, goodie. You want to claim that the Tower of Babel story is true.
>
> First, when was the Tower of Babel built?
This was around the time of Nimrod, about 3,000 - 4,000 years BC-ish.
>
> Second, do you agree that the Bible claims that the reason the
> languages were multiplied was to prevent the Tower from being
> completed?
The Bible does not simply claim that. Read and analyse the whole passage.
They did not cover the earth as had been commanded them. God said to the
Flood remnant 'Prue u revue' which is 'Go 4th and * ' They did not prue and
they did not revue. They sought to urbanise and we would have had twentieth
century technology in no time had they managed it. They were running before
they could walk, neither were they obedient to God and giving Him the glory.
>
> And that this because the Tower would have been unacceptably tall?
'reach the sky' is more than just a physical reaching.
>
> How tall would the Tower of Babel have been if it had been completed?
> (Note: I recommend you use the archaeological record to justify your
> answer.)
>
This is a mere irrelevance. Kindly posit a common ancestor of Indo European
and Finno-Ugric.
Best,
Uncle Davey
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |
| 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |
| 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 |
|