"Privacy Trap" <fmnt80@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bubctj$ejm$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
> news:bub86n$2ka$0@pita.alt.net...
> >
> > "Douglas Reay" <douglasr@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in message
> > news:Bxg*dzDaq@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk...
> > > Amanda Angelika <manic_mandy@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > BTW There is an easier to read version of this as well as the second
> day
> > > > text day http://tinyurl.com/yt9u3
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, what did you make of Baroness O'Cathain where she said:
> > >
>
> > You can't change the day of your birth, and the sex of your birth is
> almost
> > always a matter of fact, whatever happens later.
> >
> > That's my take on it.
> >
> > Uncle Davey
> > www.usenetposts.com
> >
>
> "He" if one can refer to a troll as "he" rather than 'it' is of course
> proven wrong by medical evidence, Additonaly trans-sexuals aren't
> according to some people actually changing sex at all. All they are doing
> is ensuring that thier physical form matches up to what thier brain sex is
> telling
> them. Brain sex develops long before actual organs IIRC.
>
> Besides why should there in an equal and just society be any need for
> clearly
> defined binary gender roles anyway? Such roles are a often linked to
pusdeo
> -ideological/religous claptrap about male dominance anyway....
>
> I note from the headers that Uncle Davey posts from Alt.net....
>
> >Path:
>
news.demon.co.uk!mutlu.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!demon!news.maxwell
> .syr.edu!news.alt.net!usenet
>
> ^^^^^^^^^
> >From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
> >Newsgroups: alt.support.srs,soc.support.transgendered,alt.fan.uncle-davey
> >Subject: Re: Britain - Gender Recognition Bill - Lords Hansard text for
13
> Jan 2004 (240113-09)
> >Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:01:22 +0100
> >Organization: Sox "R" Us
> >Lines: 97
> >Message-ID: <bub86n$2ka$0@pita.alt.net>
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> Which means he might be a 'sock-puppet' for one of the regular kooks :-(
>
Just because I've got an altopia account doesn't mean I am a sock puppet. I
have had some socks but I'm here in my own capacity. You cut my group out,
surely you must have noticed that my group and also the link I made to
www.usenetposts.com mean that you are dealing with the real UD, and not one
of my creations.
One of my recent creations was a female character, called Constance
Vigilant, and some of the people on the receiving end in talk.origins said I
was cross-dressing, and obviously I'm some sort of divergent sexuality
myself even for trying a female character, to which I responded that it was
no more than a novelist does when trying to compose a female character.
Nevertheless, I thought I'd have a look in here and see what was going on,
and maybe share some discussions with you. If you would concentrate on the
issues without worrying too much about whether someone is trolling, has
sockpuppets, is a fundamentalist, etc etc, perhaps we could have a more
constructive time together than if you just get on the defensive like here.
Uncle Davey
www.usenetposts.com
|
|