| Re: This didn't get through earlier, so I'm sending again... |
Optimum Online |
| Charles C. (charles_casey@opt_online.net) |
2004/01/13 15:30 |
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:07:59 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
<noway@jose.com> wrote:
>
>"Charles C." <charles_casey@opt_online.net> wrote in message
>news:btirvvsdfqjsi4cg6t34o3rfpu1mdfqfl2@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:58:35 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
>> <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >news:slrnbvr4rg.1dc.mightymartianca@namibia.tandem...
>> >> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:38:52 +0000 (UTC),
>> >> Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > news:2ceqvvc8l2jt1m0qhet8c7hii3kd9vlqlm@4ax.com...
>> >> >> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:02:12 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
>> >> >> <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >news:uqgpvv0dkst0p9q012m2osbu1248iohuv1@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >> On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:05:19 +0000 (UTC), "Constance Vigilant"
>> >> >> >> <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >"Charles C." <charles_casey@opt_online.net> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >news:7e4pvvskncd9g52ngjmrdurjs4htjej67l@4ax.com...
>> >> >> >> >> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:02:57 +0000 (UTC), "Constance Vigilant"
>> >> >> >> >> <anybodyleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >"David" <daycd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> >> >> >news:1g773sf.vi8pvl7wpdmoN%daycd@hotmail.com...
>> >> >> >> >> >> Uncle Davey <noway@jose.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> > "David" <daycd@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> <SNIP>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >You seriously need to get a life, mate.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Let's hear how you worked out that 83% male statistic, I could
>do
>> >with
>> >> > a
>> >> >> >> >laugh.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Did Google do that too and does it work on Australians?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >In Love,
>> >> >> >> >Constance Vigilant
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I need to get a life? Sorry Davey, _YOU_ need to get a life. You
>are
>> >a
>> >> >> >> professional usenet sock puppet poster. And you are no different
>> >than
>> >> >> >> the Calvinists that negatively impacted my life. It's amazing how
>> >> >> >> people half way around the world can be identical to people of
>the
>> >> >> >> same religion here bound by the same distorted view.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> You want _me_ to answer one of your questions? I have asked your
>> >> >> >> various sock puppets _DOZENS_ of questions without ever getting
>an
>> >> >> >> honest answer to them. You want an answer? Start providing them.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I certainly don't need an answer about yours and Jason's motives
>> >since
>> >> >> >> I nailed that one right on the head. I know hundreds of people
>just
>> >> >> >> like you, intelligent in select fields, financially successful in
>> >> >> >> their respective field, pious and holy in front of everyone they
>> >know,
>> >> >> >> and they all hold a sociopath sickness deep at their very core.
>The
>> >> >> >> one thing they all have in common is that they are all fundie
>> >> >> >> Calvinists. There is something about being part of the "elect"
>that
>> >> >> >> causes a purely evil soul.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thank you for proving my original point.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I found this a very negative post, in keeping with your other
>posts.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Even when somebody tries to be friendly to you, you are still as
>> >> > obnoxious
>> >> >> >as a human being can possibly be, and all that really could
>possibly
>> >> > endear
>> >> >> >you to your more appealing colleagues here is that you are on their
>> >side.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It would perhaps help you if you would stop with your amateur
>> >> >> >psychoanalysing at everyone you meet.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >And then I have also noted that you don't seem a very happy person.
>> >I'm
>> >> >> >sorry about that.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> I already described this fundie "turn-about" game in great detail
>and
>> >> >> yet here you are still trying to shift your sins on me. Are you
>really
>> >> >> that stupid or just that arrogant? Let's see if we can correct your
>> >> >> course.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Were you being nice when you attacked me with your sock puppets?
>Were
>> >> >> you being nice when you accused me of things that I didn't do? Were
>> >> >> you being nice when you reduced my struggle for my life to a
>childish
>> >> >> sexual sin? Were you being nice when you were boldly lying to me?
>Were
>> >> >> you being nice when you were setting up strawmen in an attempt to
>> >> >> discredit me? Are you being nice now with this attack on my
>character
>> >> >> by playing this fundie "turn-about" game?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So now you come back after I worked hard to break through your lies
>> >> >> and you accuse me of not being nice. You are only playing this
>"nice"
>> >> >> game now because you are trying to rescue what little is left of
>your
>> >> >> reputation. You could have come back with sincere apologies to the
>> >> >> group. You could have just disappeared. Instead of doing anything
>that
>> >> >> an honest man of character would do you come back with more games.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Don't ever count on me being "nice" to people like you Davey; you
>> >> >> don't deserve it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > All that you are interested in is either to drive wedges between
>> >> > friendships, to make people doubt their faith or to go to great
>lengths
>> >to
>> >> > document info on posters and stalk them.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have apologised to the group, but someone as bitter and negative as
>> >you
>> >> > are will never probably accept those apologies.
>> >>
>> >> Part of apologizing is not trying to justify your wrongdoing in this
>> >> fashion. You should apologize unreservedly not only to the group, but
>to
>> >> Charles C in particular, who you have abused terribly.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Aaron Clausen
>> >>
>> >> tao_of_cow/\alberni.net (replace /\ with @)
>> >>
>> >
>> >What don't you like about my apology?
>> >
>> >I have come clean, and said I am sorry. I tried to be friendly to
>Charles,
>> >but he threw it back at me, and told me he would never be nice to me.
>> >
>> >Is that why you want apologies? Just so as to reject them?
>> >
>>
>> You are using strawmen to attack my character, how is that being nice?
>> You have no intention of being nice to me because you are angry at me.
>> Every time I have cornered your sick lies you have tried to justify
>> your actions and then used strawmen to attack me. If that is your idea
>> of being nice I don't want it.
>>
>> You are only sorry that your sock puppets failed you aren't sorry for
>> using them and if you weren't cornered you would _STILL_ be using
>> them. Now you are whining about me because I won't let you walk all
>> over me. You are pathetic.
>
>So don't let me walk, fight all you can.
>
>You're obviously spoiling for a fight, you've obviously got a lot of
>emotional baggage.
>
>So bring it on, a steamin' and a rollin'.
>
I exposed you and I didn't say a single word to you again until _you_
attacked me. I am only defending myself as you play this "turn-about"
game. It's all in this thread for anyone to read. How can you keep
lying when the words are sitting in the archive for anyone to read?
I called you on your lying and deception. You denied it. I posted
information proving that you were indeed lying and deceiving. Now you
are doing everything within your power to provoke me further and to
make me look bad. Do you not realize that everything you say is
archived? Everything you are saying here is a lie and all anyone has
to do is click on this thread in Google to see that I am correct.
Give it up Davey, nobody likes a sore loser.
(Groups restored that Davey removed for this wonderful display of
childish behavior.)
Charles
Remove the underscores to contact me.
Creationism: Sci-Fi for the soul
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|
|