Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail  
From: Lenny Flank <lflank_nospam@ij.net>  
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey  
Subject: Re: David Horn's Fish  
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:02:44 +0000 (UTC)  
Organization: Newsfeeds.com http://www.newsfeeds.com 100,000+ UNCENSORED Newsgroups.  
Lines: 132  
Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org  
Approved: robomod@ediacara.org  
Message-ID: <3ff0c0e9$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com>  
References: <RZlGb.21052$C87.492@twister.socal.rr.com> <273ab496.0312261008.31f5ae8f@posting.google.com> <Xns945DBCF0B1B50doldridgsprintca@24.69.255.211> <bB7Hb.29390$nG3.8523@twister.socal.rr.com> <pan.2003.12.27.04.44.14.874655@cox.net> <sbeHb.29845$nG3.20648@twister.socal.rr.com> <bsjvae$dut$0@pita.alt.net> <f25544d.0312271928.64e59f0c@posting.google.com> <bsmlul$uv1$0@pita.alt.net> <3feef69a_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsmu4t$e1f$0@pita.alt.net> <3fef05f9$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsn1gt$kku$0@pita.alt.net> <3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com> <bsq6iq$hba$0@pita.alt.net>  
NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin  
Mime-Version: 1.0  
X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1072742564 58404 128.100.83.246 (30 Dec 2003 00:02:44 GMT)  
X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org  
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:02:44 +0000 (UTC)  
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)  
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en  
In-Reply-To: <bsq6iq$hba$0@pita.alt.net>  
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.234.67.243  
X-Comments: This message was posted through <A href  
X-Comments2: IMPORTANT: Newsfeed.com does not condone,  
X-Report: Please report illegal or inappropriate use to  
X-Comments3: <A href ="http://www.newsgroups.com">Visit  
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Dec 2003 00:03:54.0398 (UTC) FILETIME=[69D4CBE0:01C3CE68]  
X-Spam-Level: Level  
X-Spamscanner: mailbox4.ucsd.edu  (v1.4 Oct 30 2003 22:20:52, 0.0/5.0 2.60)  
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 23447 hBU03x7T038490 mailbox4.ucsd.edu)  
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1491  
  
Constance Vigilant wrote:  
  
> "Lenny Flank" <lflank_nospam@ij.net> wrote in message  
> news:3fef38ea$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...  
>  
>>Constance Vigilant wrote:  
>>  
>>  
>>>  
>>>I supposed it's quicker to answer it again.  
>>>  
>>>I am speaking my own opinions, as a human being. If they are better or  
>  
> worse  
>  
>>>informed than anyone else's comes out in the wash.  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>OK.  So your religious opinions don't mean any more than mine or my  
>>necxt door neighbor's, and you are no more holy or godlike than I am.  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>>Why must you keep tilting at this rhetorical windmill?  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>Because fundies like you keep claiming to speak on behalf of God.  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>>>Perfectly clear --- you have NO reason why your religious opinions are  
>>>>any more authoritative than anyone else's, your religious opinions  
>>>>aren't any closer to God than mine or my veterinarian's, and you don't  
>>>>want to admit it out loud.  
>>>>  
>>>>Seems pretty clear to me.  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>You've now had it out loud on numerous occasions.  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>OK.  
>>  
>>Given that, why should anyone bother to listen to any of your religious  
>>opinions.  All of us can read the Bible (or Koran or Baghavad Gita or  
>>Tao te Ching or Egyptian Book of the Dead) for ourselves.  So what do we  
>>need YOU for.  
>  
>  
> The same as I need you for.  
>  
> We need people who don't agree with us.  
  
  
  
  
Don't agree with us about what.  
  
  
  
  
  
>  
> If you prefer just books, not people, that's up to you.  
  
  
  
  
  
I haven't noticed myself concersing with any "books" in here.  Have you?  
  
  
  
>  
> That's just my opinion.  
>  
> Quite frankly, I prefer you, Lenny Flank the person, to some book of Lenny  
> Flank's opinions.  
  
  
  
  
  
Fortunately for me, others disagree with that, which is why each of my  
seven published books has done quite well (although they are, alas, all  
out of print now --- but still available as "used" copies at Amazon.com).  
  
  
  
  
>  
> The book of our opinions is being written right here anyway as a by-product  
> of the human contact.  
>  
  
  
  
  
I find very little that is "human" in your contact, "Constance".  
  
  
  
  
  
  
===============================================  
Lenny Flank  
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"  
  
Creation "Science" Debunked:  
http://www.geocities.com/lflank  
  
DebunkCreation Email list:  
http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/DebunkCreation  
  
  
  
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----  
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!  
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----  
  
 |  
  
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |  
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 |  
  |