Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Constance Vigilante Heretic
Reply-To: biblebob@saintly.com
Message-ID: <c2i9uvc13ajiff1lpvl02pvdvf7l7k2m96@4ax.com>
References: <0fv4uv8ru9oj5emlehefarc9idqmbm3f28@4ax.com> <bs2esg$2lo$0@pita.alt.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 98
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 22:09:51 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.93.87.250
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
X-Trace: twister.southeast.rr.com 1071958191 24.93.87.250 (Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:09:51 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:09:51 EST
Organization: RoadRunner - Carolina
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1225
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 22:27:39 +0100, "Constance Vigilant"
<anyoneleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote:
>
>"Bible Bob" <biblebob@saintly.com> wrote in message
>news:0fv4uv8ru9oj5emlehefarc9idqmbm3f28@4ax.com...
>> Dear Constance Vigilante:
>>
>> Do you remember these words that you posted yesterday?
>>
>> Do you remember how Bob started encouraging Jason, hiding the
>> unitarian belief that now comes out in every post of his, to set up :
>> free.christians.binaries? Well what percentage of that group is now
>> made up of sermons from his unitarian pastor Barry Mello? I'll tell
>> you; 98.5% by number and 99.5% by bandwidth.
>>
>> I think Jason was conned.
>> >
>> > : In Love,
>> > : Constance Vigilant
>>
>>
>> And do you remember how we discussed "heretic" and how it meant
>> "schismatic" someone who caused schisms in the body. Well, you
>> accomplished your goal and drove a wedge between Jason and I.
>>
>> Your above post was posted at 7PM. About fifteen minutes later you
>> posted the following:
>>
>> Subject: Am I being too hard on Bob?
>>
>> I don't like doing it, but someone has to do it.
>>
>> Or am I wrong?
>>
>>
>> In Love,
>> Constance Vigilant
>>
>> Constance you can not be hard on me because that would imply superior
>> position and you have no superior position to speak or act from. You
>> are my equal and that is the best you will ever be. You failed
>> miserably to communicate what you wanted to say to me in your posts
>> and then began attacking my pastor - you couldn't take me down so you
>> went after him. Of course you know nothing about the man or his
>> teachings, but you chose to slander him and make false accusations
>> against the two of us.
>>
>> Then you put of your little act for Jason and conned him knowing that
>> his weakness is his ego and that a simple insinuation that I had
>> conned him and used him to start a news group would cause him to go
>> insane. Your trick worked, he went nuts and attacked me and my pastor
>> and showed his true self, an egocentric self righteous hypocrite. I
>> hope you are proud of your self.
>>
>> You accuse me of being a heretic because you disagree with me about a
>> man made doctrine that you worship in place of God. And you are the
>> heretic who has caused the schism. At least I went one on one face to
>> face so to speak with those that disagreed with me. You slithered
>> around pretending to be an angel of light and showed your true colors
>> as an angel of darkness.
>>
>> You accomplished your goal and now you can sit back and gloat all you
>> want for a little while. You have to live with what you have done.
>> You do not have to answer to me or Jason or anyone else on this earth.
>> So enjoy yourself and enjoy what you reap.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>
>I'm not gloating.
>
>If you start believing Christ is God, I'll have a smile on my face.
>
>Until then, I don't think you can seriously expect any meaningful fellowship
>with those who do. After all, we think each other wrong on such an important
>and central aspect.
>
>Jason also was gentlemanly enough to make it clear I hadn't diven the wedge.
>If you believe that unitarian doctrine, no trinitarian will be able to enjoy
>close fellowship with you, however polite they might be about it.
>
>I would go on an anti-abortion march with you, or do a bunch of other things
>where we have a common interest, but standing next to you nodding while you
>set forth a non-triune God is not an option.
>
>In Love,
>Constance Vigilant
>
Dear Constance:
We both know the truth about what's going on here.
You believe whatever you want to believe and if you don't want to play
with me any more, that is ok, too.
BB
|
|