Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Bible Bob <biblebob@saintly.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
Subject: Re: Constance Vigilante
Reply-To: biblebob@saintly.com
Message-ID: <i2g9uvsvemauvvksjh6hrnfmsmhp980lsg@4ax.com>
References: <0fv4uv8ru9oj5emlehefarc9idqmbm3f28@4ax.com> <brud3s$dga$1@news.onet.pl> <fSyEb.2353$Vs3.2273@twister.socal.rr.com> <bst5uv4rnto2e66v6i0dd1d7dvq182hhbg@4ax.com> <bs2eet$164$0@pita.alt.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 195
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 22:07:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.93.87.250
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
X-Trace: twister.southeast.rr.com 1071958036 24.93.87.250 (Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:07:16 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:07:16 EST
Organization: RoadRunner - Carolina
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1224
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 22:20:23 +0100, "Constance Vigilant"
<anyoneleft@arthurandersen.com> wrote:
>
>"Bible Bob" <biblebob@saintly.com> wrote in message
>news:bst5uv4rnto2e66v6i0dd1d7dvq182hhbg@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:42:51 GMT, "Dr. Jason Gastrich" <news@jcsm.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Piorokrat wrote:
>> >> Uzytkownik "Bible Bob" <biblebob@saintly.com> napisal w wiadomosci
>> >> news:0fv4uv8ru9oj5emlehefarc9idqmbm3f28@4ax.com...
>> >>> Dear Constance Vigilante:
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you remember these words that you posted yesterday?
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you remember how Bob started encouraging Jason, hiding the
>> >>> unitarian belief that now comes out in every post of his, to set up
>> >>> : free.christians.binaries? Well what percentage of that group is now
>> >>> made up of sermons from his unitarian pastor Barry Mello? I'll tell
>> >>> you; 98.5% by number and 99.5% by bandwidth.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think Jason was conned.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> In Love,
>> >>>>> Constance Vigilant
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> And do you remember how we discussed "heretic" and how it meant
>> >>> "schismatic" someone who caused schisms in the body. Well, you
>> >>> accomplished your goal and drove a wedge between Jason and I.
>> >>>
>> >>> Your above post was posted at 7PM. About fifteen minutes later you
>> >>> posted the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> Subject: Am I being too hard on Bob?
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't like doing it, but someone has to do it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Or am I wrong?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> In Love,
>> >>> Constance Vigilant
>> >>>
>> >>> Constance you can not be hard on me because that would imply superior
>> >>> position and you have no superior position to speak or act from. You
>> >>> are my equal and that is the best you will ever be. You failed
>> >>> miserably to communicate what you wanted to say to me in your posts
>> >>> and then began attacking my pastor - you couldn't take me down so you
>> >>> went after him. Of course you know nothing about the man or his
>> >>> teachings, but you chose to slander him and make false accusations
>> >>> against the two of us.
>> >>>
>> >>> Then you put of your little act for Jason and conned him knowing that
>> >>> his weakness is his ego and that a simple insinuation that I had
>> >>> conned him and used him to start a news group would cause him to go
>> >>> insane. Your trick worked, he went nuts and attacked me and my
>> >>> pastor and showed his true self, an egocentric self righteous
>> >>> hypocrite. I hope you are proud of your self.
>> >>>
>> >>> You accuse me of being a heretic because you disagree with me about a
>> >>> man made doctrine that you worship in place of God. And you are the
>> >>> heretic who has caused the schism. At least I went one on one face
>> >>> to face so to speak with those that disagreed with me. You slithered
>> >>> around pretending to be an angel of light and showed your true colors
>> >>> as an angel of darkness.
>> >>>
>> >>> You accomplished your goal and now you can sit back and gloat all you
>> >>> want for a little while. You have to live with what you have done.
>> >>> You do not have to answer to me or Jason or anyone else on this
>> >>> earth. So enjoy yourself and enjoy what you reap.
>> >>>
>> >>> Bob
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> So you want to blame Constance for the fact that you have now gone
>> >> off the deep end and started posting hate postes about Jason into
>> >> every group he goes to?
>> >>
>> >> You might, like, like to take, like, some responsibility for your,
>> >> like, actions.
>> >>
>> >> Best
>> >>
>> >> Uncle Davey
>> >
>> >Just for the record, Constance didn't drive any wedge between me and Bob.
>I
>> >had decided to spend some time away from Bob before she said a word.
>> >
>> >Sincerely,
>> >Jason
>> >
>> Dear Uncle Davey:
>>
>> I do take responsibility. I don't hate Jason. Just getting his
>> attention.
>>
>> Dear Jason
>>
>> Then why did you parrot her charges?
>>
>> BB
>
>I stated facts that you had covered the majority of the group with Pastor
>Mello,
Please speak with honesty and integrity. If I am the only one posting
and no one else is posting, so what. What difference does it make so
long as what I post is on topic and within the 75MB guidelines and in
accordance with my ISP's TOS agreement. You are being dishonest. You
are using deception and accusations that are untrue. You are doing
what Satan does.
and also in your discussions about not believing that Christ was
pre-existent and truly God, which I find erroneous for reasons already
explained,
It doesn't matter what you "find". What matters is whether what I say
and do is in alignment and harmony with the Word of God and the group
charter. I say it is and you say it is not. Who are you to say what
is or is not true? You have not demonstrated accuracy in rightly
dividing the word of truth. If you would like to discuss the issue of
the trinity via email, I will be more than happy to do so when I have
time. But I will not engage in arguements with you. I have already
done enough wrong and will not allow you to tempt me to do any more.
you stated that you had influenced his theology a great deal.
I did not say that I had influeced my pastor's theology a great deal.
Why must you use deceptive phrases to belittle a man you know nothing
about. He knows more Bible than I may ever know and he lives it;
otherwise I would not follow him. It is very evil to attempt to
assasinate a man's character who you know nothing about. Did you
bother to download any of the sermons and listen to them? Then how
can you judge a man that you know nothing about.
My pastor teaches relationships and patterns in the Word dealing with
specific topics such asa how to abide in Christ, prayer, overcoming
problems and the like. He teaches from the Word how to live life like
Christ.
>
>My fear is that you will now attempt to use your foothold here to dissuade
>young christians from believing the deity of Christ. This would undo the
>work that other people here are doing.
You let the cat out of the bag. "Fear" does not come from God and
your "fears" are based on a conspiracy theory that you have made up.
Like all I do is sit around and try to figure out how to hurt people.
You need to get honest with God.
I have been posting a series on temptations that will help you. I
have posted the first three parts and will try to post the fourth
after I get home from work and write it. The fourth part will get
into how to overcome temptations caused by the lust of the flesh, the
lust of the eyes, and the pride of life.
At the same time a lot of what you
>write is very good, but "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump", so I am
>quite frankly afraid of the influence you could have.
Thank you for the compliment, but your fears would vanish if you will
only look at things God's way through the eyes of Christ. Your fear
based conspiracy theories are fake and for the sake of misleading
people. Constance, you need to get real honest with God. Not with
me, but with God. If you can't stand naked face to face with God,
then you have a problem that you and He need to work out.
>
>I've got nothing against you personally, I wish I had more people with your
>character and background on my team doing the work I'm doing. But for this
>group to present a disunited front on something so critical as the nature of
>God, it's a bad thing.
You do have something against me personally. I will not bend to your
will because I bend to God's. Why do you speak "sneaky speak" with
hidden agendas. Do you really think that I am not able to see through
what you are doing.
>
>In Love,
Love is better when it is a verb instead of a noun and when it is the
verb agapao.
>Constance Vigilant
>
If you want to converse with me via email, you can reach me at
buggabugga77@yahoo.com
BB
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|