| 
| Re: Hello T.O. | Posted via Supernews, ht .. |  | RainLover (SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com) | 2003/12/20 10:58 |  | 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: RainLover <SP-AMB-LOCKrainlover@raincity.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
 Subject: Re: Hello T.O.
 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:58:33 +0000 (UTC)
 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
 Lines: 31
 Sender: root@darwin.ediacara.org
 Approved: robomod@ediacara.org
 Message-ID: <5b39uv4a40ku086oh1vh4ehs23ah0fgc8s@4ax.com>
 References: <ecUCb.6254$qq.560@bignews1.bellsouth.net> <DFUCb.16309$HL2.2582@twister.socal.rr.com> <nd44uvoial858vdba1e4jlvr42a4kjvql2@4ax.com> <brue8j$inu$1@news.onet.pl> <obg6uvoemoecm4u4020vc50tn7ga1u5qhs@news.supernews.com> <bs04k3$edq$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
 NNTP-Posting-Host: darwin
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 X-Trace: darwin.ediacara.org 1071943113 30612 128.100.83.246 (20 Dec 2003 17:58:33 GMT)
 X-Complaints-To: usenet@darwin.ediacara.org
 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:58:33 +0000 (UTC)
 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:1213
 
 On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:14:12 +0000 (UTC), "Uncle Davey"
 <noway@jose.com> wrote:
 
 >>
 >> Then you don't know what scientific inquiry is. The politically correct
 >> notion that, in the interest of fairness and playing nice, everyone's
 >> opinion is worthy of respect is simply absurd in the world of science.
 >> When it comes to science, the proof is in the pudding: you put up or
 >> shut up.
 >>
 >
 >Okay, but that is not necessarily the right spirit to come to God in. God
 >requires faith. You require evidence. If I could scientifically prove God,
 >it would actually be a disaster, because faith would be of none effect.
 >
 >That is also why there is no attempt to push you into a taliban like
 >theocracy. Obedience to God should be out of gratitude for a forgiveness and
 >salvation already freely given to someone who repents and believes.
 
 This is a thread about the Origins of the earth and people, evolution
 vs creationism.  Why are you talking about 'not having the right
 spirit to come to God in'?
 
 Are you trying to CONVERT people in T.O. or explain scientifically why
 creationists are correct and science is on the wrong track?
 
 Scientifically proving God isn't the goal (or the anti-goal) of
 scientists.  They are looking at evidence and coming up with theories.
 
 James, Seattle
 
 
 | 
 
 
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |  | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 |  | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 |  | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 |  | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 |  | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 |  | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 |  | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 
 |  |