| 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail From: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
 Newsgroups: alt.fan.uncle-davey
 Subject: Re: Archaic English Spelling
 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:27:49 +0200
 Organization: nnoossppaamm
 Lines: 49
 Message-ID: <bgtr8u$cng$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>
 References: <3f31d674@news.netos.com> <bgth66$r3s$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> <3F3254C9.B41@att.net>
 Reply-To: "Uncle Davey" <noway@jose.com>
 NNTP-Posting-Host: wl70.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl
 X-Trace: nemesis.news.tpi.pl 1060270175 13040 80.50.157.70 (7 Aug 2003 15:29:35 GMT)
 X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl
 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 15:29:35 +0000 (UTC)
 X-Priority: 3
 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.uncle-davey:117
 
 
 Uzytkownik "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@att.net> napisal w wiadomosci
 news:3F3254C9.B41@att.net...
 > anonymous wrote:
 > >
 
 
 > > news:3f31d674@news.netos.com...
 > > > English includes a number of borrowed words whose spellings are
 > > > unpronounceable, as a result of retention of foreign consonant
 clusters.
 > > > For example, we have a group borrowed from Greek which begin with "ps'
 > > > psychology, psoriasis;  "pt" pterodactyl, etc.. I assume that someone
 > > > decided to preserve the ancient Greek spelling (psi), etc..
 > > >
 > > > However, I'm stumped as to why the Greek "f" sound - presumably a
 single
 > > > letter "phi" in Greek -- was introduced into English as "ph"
 (phonetic,
 > > > phrenology, etc..)
 > > >
 > > > Any suggestions?
 > >
 > > f is to p what th is to t and sh is to s and kh is to k and gh is to g
 and
 > > zh is to z.
 > >
 > > Do you have an issue with all these consonant+h bundles, or are you just
 > > being prejudicial when it comes to 'ph'?
 > >
 > > Girl called Sophie stood you up or what?
 >
 > Hey Uncle Davey,
 >
 > Now that you've unfathomably started reappearing in sci.lang, why don't
 > you come up with your promised proof of the inerrancy of the biblical
 > text (I think it was) (or was it a metric for the complexity of
 > language?) instead of typing b.s. like the above?
 > --
 > Peter T. Daniels                       grammatim@att.net
 
 Rome wasn't built in a day.
 
 I'm having to learn Lithuanian, Ancient Greek and Sanskrit in oder to prove
 my point.
 
 Uncle Davey, and Linear B had ph for the phi sound, if I remember rightly.
 
 
 
 | 
 
 |