On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:02:05 GMT, Leo <leo@home.alone> wrote:
>glen@fiddich.com wrote in news:YNgRj.136805$i_6.54063
>@fe06.news.easynews.com:
>
>> i've always liked this set - not many circumcised boys among the old pay
>> site pics - Igor was lucky and must have had a good doctor at his
>> circumcision, not like poor old Gromov.
>>
>
>I don't think Igor is circumsised, just retracted. Gromov is indeed
>unfortunate.
My read: a short foreskin.
thnxAlx
|
|