On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:05:34 GMT, squiggle
<squiggle@squiggle.squiggle> wrote:
>Alexei <alexei@mygrad.org> wrote in
>news:obhps4prksc7aun53f69csf27mf86a47qn@4ax.com:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:04:31 GMT, squiggle
>> <squiggle@squiggle.squiggle> wrote:
>>
>>>alexei@mygrad.org (Alexei) wrote in news:oxvyl.234834$RD2.134599
>>>@fe08.news.easynews.com:
>>>
>>>Thanks, Alexei. I think I have most but some are new.
>>
>> Hi squigs. That seems to be the name of the game around here.
>>
>
>Isn't it just. A long time ago and in a galaxy now far beyond the reaches
>of EN, someone posted a pretty unique bit of duplicate image software. It
>was unique for 3 reasons: first, it wasn't freeware and although the
>licence key was provided, I couldn't get full functionality. The other
>aspects were the ability to vary the search parameters so that you could
>look for a close approximation of an image and this, I guess, might have
>solved the problem of images that have been logo'd or slightly cropped etc.
>Thirdly, and best of all, you could maintain a database of every image
>scanned which meant that every time you were in doubt, you could check the
>picture against the database. Because I could never get these bits to work,
>I deleted the thing but I wish I hadn't.
I remember that sw. I probably lost mine computers ago.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.fan.teenboy/675', 'Re: this & that -- "yough2.jpg" yEnc (1/1)')){kind=link}