<me@myhumbleabode.net> wrote in message
news:jak6l45suutfar2oqqgc1paana5789htg8@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:11:00 GMT, TH1 <th1@x.invalid> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:31:42 -0500, me@myhouse.org wrote:
> >
> >><barry@whoodat(invalid).net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>"Alexei" <alexei@mygrad.org> wrote in message
> >>>news:stt1l455f0m7ruenbr6cqu8g0p5aa1qji3@4ax.com...
> >>>> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:03:01 GMT, squiggle@squiggle.squiggle
> >>>> (squiggle) wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Great pix, squig. And you too, Glen. My stocking is happily stuffed.
> >>>> thnxAlx
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>excellent selections as always.
> >>>
> >>>you guys have my appreciation
> >>>for plugging along.
> >>>
> >>>; )
> >>>best wishes always,
> >>>b~
> >>>
> >>
> >>can't you guys (especially Glen) crosspost your (much missed) pics to
> >>a group that at least Giganews carries (with binaries)?
> >>When EN yanked this group....some of us were left out in the cold.
> >>BRRRR
> >
> >EN carries it, but only on its old servers, not the .us or .eu ones.
>
> Doesn't anyone agree that the amount of time this newgroup will be
> available here on EN is really limited? Eventually, they will shut
> this server down.
> Anyone given a thought to a game plan?
I've been wondering about that since June, when
the original server was "supposed" to be gone.
The only solution I can think of is to decide on another
unused group, or create one, and only publish the
name *here* before it's really gone. It should be
a group available (with binaries) on the major
servers. Some of them carry a group, but the
binaries never show up, especially in the
"fan" situation.
b~
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
|