| Re: The usual pedophile bullshit |
EasyNews, UseNet made Ea .. |
| TednAlice (TednAlice@gotcha.net) |
2006/12/18 12:56 |
On 18 Dec 2006 15:20:03 GMT, positivesexfiend@hotmail.com (Positive
Sex Fiend) wrote:
>Secret-Squirrel@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org wrote:
>> positivesexfiend@hotmail.com (Positive Sex Fiend) wrote in
>> news:20061217005242.645$VB@newsreader.com:
>>
>> > Yes, it does:
>> >
>> > Same sex marriage.
>> > http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/06/28/samesex050628.html
>> > http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/12/14/politics/main22694
>> > 48.shtml
>> >
>> > Of course, somethings don't (and that is a good thing):
>> >
>> > MPs vote against raising age of sexual consent.
>> > http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20050928
>> > /C313_ageofcons entbill_20050928?s_name=&no_ads=
>>
>> Did Canada nix raising the AOC? That would be good news. (The
>> article date says '2005', I get a 404 on the link.
>>
>> Secret Squirrel
>
>Here is the article:
>
>MPs vote against raising age of sexual consent
>Updated Thu. Sep. 29 2005 6:31 AM ET
>
>CTV.ca News Staff
>
>A Conservative MP's attempt to raise the age of consent has failed, with a
>resounding defeat in the House of Commons.
>
>When Conservative MP Rick Casson's bill was put to a vote Wednesday night,
>99 parliamentarians voted in favour of increasing the minimum age of
>consent for sex by two years, to 16.
>
>Another 167 MPs voted against the bill.
>
>Under existing law, 14-year-olds can legally have sex in Canada. Casson
>wanted the minimum age raised to 16, in the hope that increasing the scope
>of the law would protect children from sexual predators.
>
>The Lethbridge, Alberta MP had the support of his fellow Conservatives, as
>well as several members of the Liberal Party.
>
>"I support it basically on the important principle that people need to be
>protected," Liberal MP Maurizo Bevilacqua told CTV News ahead of the vote.
>
>And Liberal MP Dan McTeague agreed, criticizing the existing law for doing
>little to protect young teenagers from sexual exploitation.
>
>"If two young people are engaged, that's fine, but my concern is when a
>40-year-old and a 14-year-old is involved," McTeague said.
>
>But in the end, their support was not enough to carry the bill.
>
>Justice Minister Irwin Cotler was among the proposed law's most outspoken
>critics. He said Casson's legislation -- if it became the law of the land
>-- would not only do little to stop predators, it would also criminalize
>so-called "puppy love."
>
>And that's a step he was not prepared to take.
>
>"We don't want to criminalize innocent sexual behaviour among teenagers and
>young people," Cotler said.
>
>Casson had hoped that hurdle could be overcome by close-in-age exemptions
>for young people born within three or four years of each other.
>
>According to the Attorney General, however, the Criminal Code and the
>pending Bill C-2 already before Parliament offers adequate protection for
>children.
Don't mean to butt in to your conversation with the National Socialist
NB,[ if that is even possible], but let me say that once again, the
Amerikans are proving themselves to be the more backwards of nations.
|
|
|