Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Ghost <deadly@night.shade>
Organization: Ghost Mirrors
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Hogwasher/4.2.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <0001HW.C5FC03F20017C53EF0305530@news.easynews.com>
Subject: Re: Re beauty in drawing II
Newsgroups: alt.fan.smeagol
Reply-To: Whom.Everyouw.ant
X-No-Archive: yes
Approved: yes
References: <999f9493b65c2170b29a78cdfdacd5c3@dizum.com>
Lines: 24
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:20:33 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.smeagol:1483
On Apr 1, 2009, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> I think, too, that people need to *find* beauty, need to *work* to
> *discover* it. If they are presented with *obligatory* beauty, in other
> words, something which has the expectation that it *will* (as in
> "should" and "must") be seen as beautiful, then that beauty will be as a
> result less compelling and involving than what they participatate in
> creating with the artist.
>
> Beauty is not a one-man (-boy!) show, it emerges somewhere in the area
> of interaction between the artist, the object (subject), and the viewer.
>
> Yes? No? (Would you repeat the question...) ;)
>
> m...o...
>
Go here:
http://anonib.com/sitedir.php?all=1&pLimit=100
--
Ghost
|
|