On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:42:00 -0400, "::Y-Not::" <$9+-Y-Not@here.com> wrote:
>In article <lmb3m1l5hkf47qsbgbqi0e6bn80tka6k99@4ax.com>, F_Monk_
><no@any.way> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:06:43 -0400, "::Y-Not::" <$9+-Y-Not@here.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <bug0m1dffo77oi1pum7jifmp97rc41d1bb@4ax.com>, F_Monk_
>> ><no@any.way> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:15:28 -0500, Lil Stinker NP-g07
>> >> <anywhere@uwant2.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:23:47 -0400, "::Y-Not::" <$9+-Y-Not@here.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>In article <XnQ7f.17122$3k2.2979@fe08.news.easynews.com>, Rolex
>> >> >><Rolex@webmaster.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> hell no. you are not boring this group one bit, dragon poems are ok
>> >> >>> in
>> >> >>> my
>> >> >>> book too. keep on trucking ole lil-stinker. all i am doing is
>> >> >>> posting
>> >> >>> a
>> >> >>> little variety. trying to please everyone with this idea. do you have
>> >> >>> any
>> >> >>> hobbies or interests, if so, post some
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> --
>> >> >>> "May Dragons Fly Ever in your Dreams"
>> >> >>> Rolex
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>I agree with you, hole in the heartly. :-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Gemstone, in the Fort, said he likes well, gemstones. If we could get
>> >> >>him here, maybe he could post some pics of them? If you wouldn't mind.
>> >> >>Anyway, it doesn't look as if he's going to post pics in the Fort in
>> >> >>the near future. :-(
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Take care,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Y Not
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes I agree. :)
>> >> >
>> >> >Yeah, Bobber mishandled that one.
>> >> >
>> >> >I'll try a ping to him.
>> >> >
>> >> >Lil Stinker
>> >> > "just havin' fun!"
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ummmm, not really.
>> >>
>> >> my take on Gemstone is a slight case of cold feet. coulda been buyer's
>> >> remorse if he had continued to take that final step in asking for a
>> >> badge. he seems to have been overwhelmed at the direction of the
>> >> threads recently and I sense he will ask again in the near futur.
>> >> hopefully.
>> >>
>> >> my 2 cents...
>> >>
>> >> F.
>> >
>> >It was *Doc* who mishandled him.
>> >Well, my sense is that he noticed that Doc isn't the peacemaker he
>> >seems to be, and fears more wars because of that. It also indicates a
>> >desire for fairness, and a strong dislike of lies.
>> >Also, his post in the "boooooooooorrring" thread, indicates a moral
>> >code, and an understanding and appreciation of religion, and an
>> >indignation toward hypocrisy. AND, an appreciation of security.
>> >Remember, he said he's been watching these newsgroups for years. So, he
>> >ain't no newbie. People shouldn't assume he doesn't know what's going
>> >on, just because he hasn't posted much.
>> >He isn't posting with same server he used to. Perhaps he read my server
>> >posts, and saw that the one he is using now is the cheapest. Also, he
>> >is posting with the newsreader Pan, but it isn't shown as it usually
>> >is. This indicates an above average knowledge of computers and
>> >software, and even programming. Pan is a cross platform newsreader, for
>> >Win, Linux and the UNIX X10 environment on the Mac. I tried it on the
>> >Mac, and couldn't get it to work.
>> >Over all, even though he could benefit from a spell checker, and a
>> >little more attention to grammar, he shows some good intelligence, an
>> >ethical awareness, honesty, and strong feelings he is fully aware of
>> >but isn't controlled by. He's not going to be snowed by anyone, and is
>> >willing to show that.
>> >I *like* him. What, it doesn't show? :-)
>> >
>> >It's interesting to noted that he seems to be a little hesitant to
>> >address anyone directly, who's been involved in the arguments. He
>> >included my posts in his second post to Doc, but was careful not to
>> >actually discuss the contents. I think he's deeper than he wants us to
>> >see, at the moment. If he sticks around, it should be interesting to
>> >watch what he does :-)
>> >
>> >
>> >Take care,
>> >
>> >
>> >Y Not
>> >
>> >
>> >PS.
>> >I wonder if he sees a contradiction in Boomer's post to him, and if so,
>> >what he will do about it, if anything. :-)
>> >
>> >
>> > "Wisdom can come from many sources,
>> > but will we have the wisdom to recognize it?"
>>
>> ditto :)
>>
>> F.
>
>
>Mistake there. I meant Bobber, not the other "person".
>And he DID see it. :-)
>"Lazy sissies"? An interesting way to rip someone's guts out. :-)
>
>I had someone check GemStone's server (they don't list the groups on
>their web site), and they don't have this group and the discussion
>group. I asked my friend to see if he could request them, but they are
>VERY slow to add groups. Their FAQ says they have to be "active" before
>they will carry them, but they didn't say how active.
>
>GemStone has posted before, with another name. I didn't begin to
>suspect who he was until just after my post here about him. What tipped
>me off was his phrasing, and the narrow time window in which he posted.
>He told us today, at least for Doc and I, who he is. I think what
>caused him to do that, and also to return to posting in the Fort, was
>that I mentioned his sad situation in Doc's thread that Doc didn't see,
>and he wanted Doc to see it.
>As for what else GemStone is doing, well, he seems to be taking my idea
>that talk is cheap and that it's actions that count, and running like
>ah, heck with it. I just hope he doesn't get tackled too hard because
>of it. I have a feeling that abc and the quacker will try it. :-(
>Of course, it would be better if other people defended him, but I'm
>afraid that the "lazy sissies" situation may cause that not to happen.
>
>If anyone wants more background about GemStone's past posting
>situation, that will have to be provided in private.
>
>
>Take care,
>
>
>Y Not
I would like to learn more if I am not being out of line.
After all I did encourage him to apply for a badge.
Lil Stinker
"just havin' fun!"
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|