On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:06:43 -0400, "::Y-Not::" <$9+-Y-Not@here.com>
wrote:
>In article <bug0m1dffo77oi1pum7jifmp97rc41d1bb@4ax.com>, F_Monk_
><no@any.way> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:15:28 -0500, Lil Stinker NP-g07
>> <anywhere@uwant2.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:23:47 -0400, "::Y-Not::" <$9+-Y-Not@here.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>In article <XnQ7f.17122$3k2.2979@fe08.news.easynews.com>, Rolex
>> >><Rolex@webmaster.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> hell no. you are not boring this group one bit, dragon poems are ok in
>> >>> my
>> >>> book too. keep on trucking ole lil-stinker. all i am doing is posting
>> >>> a
>> >>> little variety. trying to please everyone with this idea. do you have
>> >>> any
>> >>> hobbies or interests, if so, post some
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> "May Dragons Fly Ever in your Dreams"
>> >>> Rolex
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>I agree with you, hole in the heartly. :-)
>> >>
>> >>Gemstone, in the Fort, said he likes well, gemstones. If we could get
>> >>him here, maybe he could post some pics of them? If you wouldn't mind.
>> >>Anyway, it doesn't look as if he's going to post pics in the Fort in
>> >>the near future. :-(
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Take care,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Y Not
>> >
>> >Yes I agree. :)
>> >
>> >Yeah, Bobber mishandled that one.
>> >
>> >I'll try a ping to him.
>> >
>> >Lil Stinker
>> > "just havin' fun!"
>>
>>
>> ummmm, not really.
>>
>> my take on Gemstone is a slight case of cold feet. coulda been buyer's
>> remorse if he had continued to take that final step in asking for a
>> badge. he seems to have been overwhelmed at the direction of the
>> threads recently and I sense he will ask again in the near futur.
>> hopefully.
>>
>> my 2 cents...
>>
>> F.
>
>It was *Doc* who mishandled him.
>Well, my sense is that he noticed that Doc isn't the peacemaker he
>seems to be, and fears more wars because of that. It also indicates a
>desire for fairness, and a strong dislike of lies.
>Also, his post in the "boooooooooorrring" thread, indicates a moral
>code, and an understanding and appreciation of religion, and an
>indignation toward hypocrisy. AND, an appreciation of security.
>Remember, he said he's been watching these newsgroups for years. So, he
>ain't no newbie. People shouldn't assume he doesn't know what's going
>on, just because he hasn't posted much.
>He isn't posting with same server he used to. Perhaps he read my server
>posts, and saw that the one he is using now is the cheapest. Also, he
>is posting with the newsreader Pan, but it isn't shown as it usually
>is. This indicates an above average knowledge of computers and
>software, and even programming. Pan is a cross platform newsreader, for
>Win, Linux and the UNIX X10 environment on the Mac. I tried it on the
>Mac, and couldn't get it to work.
>Over all, even though he could benefit from a spell checker, and a
>little more attention to grammar, he shows some good intelligence, an
>ethical awareness, honesty, and strong feelings he is fully aware of
>but isn't controlled by. He's not going to be snowed by anyone, and is
>willing to show that.
>I *like* him. What, it doesn't show? :-)
>
>It's interesting to noted that he seems to be a little hesitant to
>address anyone directly, who's been involved in the arguments. He
>included my posts in his second post to Doc, but was careful not to
>actually discuss the contents. I think he's deeper than he wants us to
>see, at the moment. If he sticks around, it should be interesting to
>watch what he does :-)
>
>
>Take care,
>
>
>Y Not
>
>
>PS.
>I wonder if he sees a contradiction in Boomer's post to him, and if so,
>what he will do about it, if anything. :-)
>
>
> "Wisdom can come from many sources,
> but will we have the wisdom to recognize it?"
ditto :)
F.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
|