Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "::darkshadows::" <a@b.c>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rolex
Subject: Copyright Explained
Organization: theshadowlands
Reply-To: any@where.org
Message-ID: <1uulo2hamvkn9kva55il3v7nm9i7n876c6@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.1/32.1088
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:26:05 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.rolex:3028
Copyright Explained
When you write copy you have the right to copyright the copy you
write, if the copy is right. If however, your copy falls over, you
must right your copy. If you write religious services you write rite,
and have the right to copyright the rite you write.
Very conservative people write right copy, and have the right to
copyright the right copy they write. A right wing cleric would write
right rite, and has the right to copyright the right rite he has the
right to write. His editor has the job of making the right rite copy
right before the copyright can be right.
Should Jim Wright decide to write right rite, then Wright would write
right rite, which Wright has the right to copyright. Duplicating that
rite would copy Wright right rite, and violate copyright, which Wright
would have the right to right.
Right?
DARKSHADOWS
|
|