Mephistopheles <no-fixed@address.net> wrote in
news:5vl6m2toqph983feduc367mn4lfdbcac6j@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:17:08 -0800, ::darkshadows:: wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:44:30 GMT, WingedMessenger <Boy@Flying.high>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"Rolex" <rolex@astraweb.com> wrote in news:PeE8h.51536$g12.48863
>>>@fe06.news.easynews.com:
>>>
>>>> NO ! not unless you want to
>>>> Been thinking about using the sister group for images only
>>>> and keeping this group for all to post whatever they choose
>>>> Now don't get me wrong, WM, this is only a suggestion
>>>> Does this sound feasible and acceptable
>>>> what is your opinion, please ???
>>>
>>>
>>>Yep seems a good idea. Will continue here with music and also the
other
>>>music group.
>>>
>>>Mercury.
>>
>>
>>I have moved the ship posts there because I do not think there is as
>>much interest now that the Royal Navy has been posted. There is no
>>cause for a wholesale move by all. We know how uppity :-) the
>>British are of their naval fleet and feel that no others can compare.
>>I knew the interest would drop off after that.
>
> Just as well you moved swiftly to protect then German ships. I popped
> over to look, & the first 14 images were of the
> admiral_graf_spee,........sinking, sinking sinking.
>
> You DO know who did for her, don't yer? Battle of the River Plate, &
> all that. It took refuge in Argentinian Waters, but there ain't no
> hiding place from the Royal Navy. Sad times indeed.
>
> Mephi
>
>
>
>>
>>Down periscope!!!
>>
>>darkshadows
>
>
GO get 'em Mephi. LOL.
Mercury.
|
|