On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:17:08 -0800, ::darkshadows:: wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:44:30 GMT, WingedMessenger <Boy@Flying.high>
>wrote:
>
>>"Rolex" <rolex@astraweb.com> wrote in news:PeE8h.51536$g12.48863
>>@fe06.news.easynews.com:
>>
>>> NO ! not unless you want to
>>> Been thinking about using the sister group for images only
>>> and keeping this group for all to post whatever they choose
>>> Now don't get me wrong, WM, this is only a suggestion
>>> Does this sound feasible and acceptable
>>> what is your opinion, please ???
>>
>>
>>Yep seems a good idea. Will continue here with music and also the other
>>music group.
>>
>>Mercury.
>
>
>I have moved the ship posts there because I do not think there is as
>much interest now that the Royal Navy has been posted. There is no
>cause for a wholesale move by all. We know how uppity :-) the
>British are of their naval fleet and feel that no others can compare.
>I knew the interest would drop off after that.
Just as well you moved swiftly to protect then German ships. I popped
over to look, & the first 14 images were of the
admiral_graf_spee,........sinking, sinking sinking.
You DO know who did for her, don't yer? Battle of the River Plate, &
all that. It took refuge in Argentinian Waters, but there ain't no
hiding place from the Royal Navy. Sad times indeed.
Mephi
>
>Down periscope!!!
>
>darkshadows
|
|