Craig Oilfield wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:54:04 -0400, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Craig Oilfield wrote:
>>> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:47:38 +0100, "Steve Leyland"
>>> <steveREMOVEDOTINVALIDTOREPLY@meow.org.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi. This is the meow-send program at usenet. I'm afraid I wasn't able to
>>>>deliver any clue to the following address: craig@oil.com "Craig
>>>>Oilfield"
>>>>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>>>>
>>>>: On 27 Jul 2006 07:53:38 -0700, joseph.hutcheon@virgin.net wrote:
>>>>:
>>>>:: Craig Oilfield wrote:
>>>>::: On 27 Jul 2006 06:16:50 -0700, joseph.hutcheon@virgin.net wrote:
>>>>:::
>>>>:::: Craig Oilfield wrote:
>>>>::::
>>>>::::: Why are these people being paid to spectate? What is their
>>>>::::: function? What use have they been? Why do they think they won't
>>>>::::: get shot while spectating in a war zone?
>>>>::::
>>>>:::: They're not spectators, they're observers. HTH.
>>>>:::
>>>>::: I find the observations in the Spectator are different from the
>>>>::: spectacles in the Observer only in their political bias.
>>>>::
>>>>:: You need a Private Eye to get the inside story.
>>>>:
>>>>: So, farewell then, Hassan Nasrallah....
>>>>
>>>>who he?
>>>
>>> He terrorman.
>>
>>He the one that used to work for the Feta Movement?
>
> Making cheese?
Of course.
--
ah
|
|