Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rolex
Subject: Re: New Newsgroup Proposed Respond Please
From: WingedMessenger <Boy@Flying.high>
References: <i_zlg.236865$W33.139794@fe03.news.easynews.com>
Organization: Your Company
Message-ID: <Xns97E7B2B3D2350Olympusorg@140.99.99.130>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 26
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:34:07 GMT
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.rolex:1672
"Rolex" <rolex@twebmaster.com> wrote in
news:i_zlg.236865$W33.139794@fe03.news.easynews.com:
> New Group Proposed
>
> Hi all. am contimplating on starting a new group titled:
> <alt.binaries.rolex>
> Being a binary group this will allow all to view the posts. The
> group will be similar to this one, with tighter restrictions, to keep
> spammers and trolls from being a pest.
>
> Everyone knows the hell I went through to get this group and, believe
> me, it will be the same all over again. I want to give it a try and
> want opinions for all who visit this group. Also if I get it
> started, this group will fill up with smart asses and their replys.
> DO ignore them
>
> PLEASE RESPOND, with your comments and suggestions
> If there are no responses then I will proceed accordingly.
>
> Thanks
>
What is your interpretation of tighter restrictions?
Mercury.
|
|