Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole812@webtv.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Expose on Jehovah Witnesses Pedophile Cover-Up...keep frankie the freak away from your underage daughters
Date: 24 Apr 2006 07:29:23 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 133
Message-ID: <1145888963.561789.195920@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
References: <1145597641.057127.26880@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<uith421rbiojecd5evjd9708ecqd5l4g60@4ax.com>
<1145632777.756025.58150@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<9b0i429r54jjds1is4ms382lri09rinjvd@4ax.com>
<1145637374.747113.40860@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<ajaj42hqe443c20tt0a34gd5nieqk9r5ap@4ax.com>
<1145809368.410742.35090@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<keao429a7at8ecf78tclmofe9amma1k279@4ax.com>
<1145849303.445178.289460@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<56jo42dhldrkolcp4naiv9bm3kgenserpa@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.117.11
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1145888970 12352 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2006 14:29:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:29:30 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <56jo42dhldrkolcp4naiv9bm3kgenserpa@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; AOL 9.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: HTTP/1.1 (Velocity/1.3.32 [uScMs f p eN:t cCMp s ]), HTTP/1.1 Turboweb [dtc-ta023 8.4.0], HTTP/1.0 cache-dtc-ae07.proxy.aol.com[CDBC750B] (Traffic-Server/5.4.3 [uScM])
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.188.117.11;
posting-account=NyOLFwwAAAAPLpyFXurBWeOLjKCj8g6l
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:975
Frank McCoy wrote:
> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole100@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Frank McCoy wrote:
> >> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole100@hotmail.com> wr
ote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Frank McCoy wrote:
> >> >> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole444@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Frank McCoy wrote:
> >> >> >> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole812@webtv.net
> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Frank McCoy wrote:
> >> >> >> >> In alt.fan.frank.mccoy "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole812@webtv.
net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >Transcript NBC DATELINE Expose on Jehovah Witnesses Pedophil
e Cover-Up
> >> >> >> >> >SHOW: Dateline
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >DATE: May 28, 2002
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Yep ... Saw that show on TV.
> >> >> >> >> The Religious Leaders of that group aren't exactly the Godly
people they pretend
> >> >> >> >> to be, are they? But then: Those who protest most often tha
t they are the
> >> >> >> >> annointed of God, rarely indeed are truly righteous people.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The truly good people do their work, and ask for no rewards o
ther than the joy
> >> >> >> >> of doing it.
> >> >> >> >]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Who asked YOU frankie..
> >> >> >> >You're worse then the JW's
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I, at least, am not a hypocrite; and don't condone what they do.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >No, you're a pedophile....
> >> >>
> >> >> If "pedophile" = "Someone who thinks underaged girls are sexy."
> >> >> And "underaged" includes teenagers, then I guess I am.
> >> >> Teenaged girls, as I've pointed out before, *ARE* sexy; often VERY
sexy.
> >> >> If you mean somebody who has sex with kids, then no.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Since you seem to think there is nothing wrong with your lust for you
ng
> >> >girls I would suggest emailing FBI.gov and tell them how "wrong" they
> >> >are.........
> >>
> >> There's nothing illegal about lusting after anybody.
> >> What's illegal is what you *do*, not what you think.
> >> So far, anyway. Bush & Co. are doing their best to make thinking
> >> non-government-approved thoughts illegal.
> >>
> >> And I'm sure the FBI knows all about me; as do Customs and the Post Of
fice, as
> >> well as the local police. Hell, I even showed the local police the st
ories I
> >> write, and they agreed that *writing* stories like that isn't illegal.
> >
> >Somebody turned old frankie in?
> >
> >BWAAAAHAHAHAHA
> >
> Correction:
> Somebody *tried* to.
> The cops agreed that what I was doing was *quite* legal.
> What I have around the house isn't even really considered "porn", let alo
ne CP.
>
> > Somebody
> >> mistakenly thought they were "child porn".
> >>
> >> So, I *voluntarily* showed them around my house, showed them the stori
es I
> >> wrote, and showed them the computer. Nothing illegal anywhere. Like
people
> >> here, I told them that because I *was* willing to stand up in court an
d defend
> >> my right to write and post *stories*, I didn't even have legal *adult*
porn on
> >> the computer; that way there wouldn't be any distractions if somebody
got
> >> overzealous and tried to prosecute me. They agreed that was the way t
o do
> >> things.
> >>
> >
> >So you go to all that trouble and embarrassment just to write perverted
> >stories???
>
> To support the First Amendment, among other things.
> My stories also have other points I try to make.
> They're *not* just sex-stories, as I've pointed out many times before.
>
> >I knew you were insane
>
> Well, it's no surprise to me either than you don't support the 1st Amendm
ent.
Wrong, I don't support child molesting freaks and perverts, you fit
both catagories.
People like you don't deserve 1st Amendment rights
> You've already made it *quite* clear many times that you support the idea
of
> thought-control. If somebody thinks things or has ideas you don't like,
you
> want them imprisoned or even killed.
>
> I suspect you'd want anybody who's read "The Communist Manifesto" incarce
rated
> as a Communist. That's about your style and way of thinking.
>
> --
> _____
> ,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
> (_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|