Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "bobandcarole" <bobandcarole812@webtv.net>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
Subject: Re: Oprah's child predator watch list
Date: 23 Apr 2006 08:46:13 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <1145807173.339255.163010@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
References: <1145596391.463752.97210@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<1145630284.899780.46610@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<1145659941.594870.228030@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<220420061141382683%BusyGuy@Work.ru>
<1145756348.500236.63880@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
<230420061225352858%BusyGuy@Work.ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.203.173.48
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1145807181 14032 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2006 15:46:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 15:46:21 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <230420061225352858%BusyGuy@Work.ru>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.203.173.48;
posting-account=NyOLFwwAAAAPLpyFXurBWeOLjKCj8g6l
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.fan.prettyboy:962
BusyGuy wrote:
> In article <1145756348.500236.63880@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
> <christopherkidwell3@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > BusyGuy wrote:
> > > In article <1145659941.594870.228030@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> > > <christopherkidwell3@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Now, I take issue with something on here. They are saying that those
> > > > children who were killed recently in 'sexual' crimes were killed by
> > > > pedophiles. BULLSHIT! Those people were no more pedophiles, than adult
> > > > rapists are heterosexuals!
> > >
> > >
> > > Oops. you got that dangerously-wrong !
> > >
> > > "Adult rapists" are a subset of "Heterosexuals."
> > >
> > > "Child killers" are not a subset of "Pedophiles".
> > >
> > > "Child killers" and "pedophiles" are both subsets of "General
> > > population." Otherwise, they are antagonists. (chalk/cheese.)
> >
> > Actually, think about it this way. The defintion of a heterosexual is
> > "A man/woman who has consensual, loving sexual encounters with a
> > woman/man." The definition of a rapist is "A man/woman who FORCES
> > sexual encounters on women/men and gets pleasure by dominating them."
> >
> > How are rapists a subset of heterosexual men?
>
> Slow down, Christopher. I've pointed out to you before how unwise it is
> to mis-quote.
He's an idiot, what do you expect?
>
> I did not say "rapists are a subset of heterosexual men" i said
> "heterosexuals."
>
> The standard definition (well, let's not be arrogant; _my_ definition)
> of a heterosexual is "a person who is sexually- and/or
> romantically-attracted to the opposite gender."
>
> Try "manifestation of sexual passion for one of the opposite sex..."
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosexual> (I didn't like the last two
> words so I clipped them.)
>
> or "of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual
> desire toward individuals of the opposite sex"
> <http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=heterosexual>
>
> or "Heterosexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by romantic
> love or sexual desire exclusively for members of the opposite sex or
> gender...."
> <http://encycl.opentopia.com/term/Heterosexuality>
>
> There is no mention of a "consensual" or even "reciprocal" element
> being required. Indeed, probably 99% of all adult heterosexual males
> experience lust, sometimes strong passion, for women or a particuar
> woman, a hundred times a day without the woman consenting to that
> emotion because she is simply unaware of its existence. The object of
> their lust could be a heterosexual woman or could be a lesbian or a
> ball-breaking bitch, the guy usually has no way of knowing.
>
> No relationship is required in order to define a person as a
> heterosexual so there need be no sex or any other contact at all. It is
> an orientation, not a behavior.
>
> I'll snip the rest of your post because, frankly, it's all nonsense.
|
|