On 2010-03-23 19:39:42 -0500, NP-f31 said:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:03:52 -0500, insane for boys! wrote:
>
>> On 2010-03-23 17:01:50 -0500, insane for boys! said:
>>
>>> On 2010-03-23 16:55:00 -0500, "_C'0-SM-oS," <oezse@sats.com> said:
>>>
>>>> insane for boys! wrote in
>>>> news:4ba93439$0$25212$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2010-03-23 16:27:11 -0500, "_C'0-SM-oS," <oezse@sats.com> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> insane for boys! wrote in
>>>>>> news:4ba828be$0$10524$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2010-03-22 01:15:18 -0500, Morpheus <Morpheus@dreamland.com>
>>>>>>> said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:50:00 -0700, insane for boys! wrote
>>>>>>>> (in article <4ba6ccc8$0$9197$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2010-03-20 17:34:50 -0500, "_C'0-SM-oS," <oezse@sats.com> said:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> insane for boys! wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:4ba535fc$0$19029$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2010-03-19 23:32:43 -0500, "Dexter"
>>>>>>>>>>> <Dexter@DarkPassenger.com> said:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice but you take what you can get,,,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dexter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> About the 2 replies, that is very true. And thank you Dexter SO
>>>>>>>>>>> VERY much for posting the Jimmy sets!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well I think the Jimmy site is sailing about as close as they can
>>>>>>>>>> with the last few sets and even have a hunch that the last may
>>>>>>>>>> have pushed the boat out a little further now he had turned
>>>>>>>>>> sixteen when the shots were made.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cosmos
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do you know what his age is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What a silly question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why is that a silly question? Cosmos claims to know Jimmy's age. I'm
>>>>>>> wondering how he knows what it is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi IFB
>>>>>> I think Morph felt I would be to shy to answer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very shrewd of you to beware of what may be false information,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Always treat all you encounter on Usenet as potential LEA and act
>>>>>> accordingly, after all you never really know whom it is you are
>>>>>> talking to today, and even if you think you know who it was
>>>>>> yesterday, that's not a guarantee for tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some of the things I said such as dates a few of the photos were made
>>>>>> can be verified from meta data!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All digital cameras implant text data within the picture file, such
>>>>>> as Date, time, make of camera and serial number, most studios in our
>>>>>> arena tend to delete this info as part of good housekeeping, however.
>>>>>> Deleting and erasing the data are different, forensic techniques are
>>>>>> always advancing,
>>>>>> It's now even possible to write your own spoof data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A year or two ago some fine fellow obtained a copy of the latest
>>>>>> Harry Potter Book (he was employed by the publishing company) and
>>>>>> posted fine JPEG's of all the pages on the web only it was 3 months
>>>>>> before publication was due, he was caught when he police cross
>>>>>> checked the camera serial number against the guarantee registers of
>>>>>> the camera manufacturer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cosmos npf49
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing claimed everything is denied
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not even sure what you mean and what that has to do with you
>>>>> knowing what Jimmy's age. So, can you please tell me how you know what
>>>>> Jimmy's age is? Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Sold as seen! Reject what's not required
>>>>
>>>> Cosmos
>>>
>>> Now I'm really confused.
>>
>> All I would like to know is this: How do you know what Jimmy's age is?
>
> Hi IFB,
>
> 1) Cosmos knows how old Jimmy was when a certain picture was taken
> from information on the original website.
>
> 2) The meta data on one of the original photos from the site has the
> date and time the photo was taken.
>
> 3) Cosmos can take that date and extrapolate the years since and come
> up with an accurate age for Jimmy.
>
> 4) However, Cosmos doesn't know Jimmy's birthday, so he can't tell you
> EXACTLY how old Jimmy is.
>
> 5) I would still like to lick the chrome off of Jimmy's 16 year old
> gearshift. (in a country where such a thing would be legal).
>
> It's a math problem really.
>
> Doc
> NP-f31
Ah, thanks very much for the explanation. And I VERY MUCH agree with
statement number 5! :D
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|