On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:59:54 -0500, NP-f31 wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>While one of the men in your photos still has some boyish good looks,
>neither of these gentlemen have been boys in years. They are grown
>men, twinks at best.
>
>By continuing to refer to them as 'boys' demonstrates your lack of
>understanding on what constitutes a boy in this and other groups you
>spam. I suggest that you try calling them 'guys', which is a much more
>honest approach.
>
>Remember, you're advertising to us. As it turns out we know what we
>like, we like boys. We can tell the difference between a boy and a
>hairy old man who shaved his pubes off. If you want our business
>you'll have to start hiring real boys as models. I'm not suggesting
>that you photograph real boys nude and with their dicks up each
>other's backsides. They can have all their clothes on, we appreciate
>them for their beauty, not their dicks. Take a look at what is posted
>here, New Star and Model Promotions are making a lot of money from us.
>They give us real boys and teens. No nudes, just beauty. No sex, just
>sexiness.
>
>Think about it.
>
>Doc
>NP-f31
There's always CTB, where older youths are welcome. Best to take
there.
|
|
){kind=link}