In article <Grant-me-that-1601102@Grant.Grant>, +Grant.
<+Grant@grant.grant> wrote:
> In article <ddq4l5prc7bue96iabvnh89cv558fc30b0@4ax.com>, Rebulon Ruster
> <reb.ruster@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 16 Jan 2010 19:16:02 -0600, " +Grant. " <+Grant@grant.grant> wrote:
> >
> > >In article
> > ><5c01e80e-897c-4f10-9c1a-60e5ce81edf1@e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
> > >youngnicky <nbnicker@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> > hey guys how are u doing i am a ounger boy that loves younger boys i
> > >> > have pics of me and other boys i would like to trade i am sure that
> > >> > people think i am fake but i am not i would love to talk to a guy in
> > >> > the Oregon area if i could or swap pics with a guy if i could thank
> > >> > you and i hope to hear back
> > >>
> > >> i would love to thank the ones that help i now have a hushmail and i
> > >> still stand by what i said before i would love to talk to someone tho
> >
> > Beside which, it's easy to locate you on Gmail:
> > ======================================
> > Name: Nick James Location: Portland, OR Age: 18 Gender: Male
> >
> > MX Records Exchange IP Address
> > 1 gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 209.85.222.51
> > 2 alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 209.85.211.90
> > 3 alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 209.85.221.33
> > 4 alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 209.85.219.24
> > 5 alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com 72.14.221.114
>
> I don't think it was a good idea to post this but we don't know how
> accurate the info is. The account holder could have lied about all or
> part of it when setting it up which is good policy if you want to
> access restricted google groups and aren't old enough.
>
> The 209 addresses are google servers. The 72 address bounces around the
> 209 servers and ends in a major server with the name of
> "MX.UNOWNEDBAND.COM". Whatever that means.
> This is the first time I researched google addresses.
>
> Google posts are a source of other informative and searchable "items"
> but I'm not going to mess with that here.
>
> Does 18 qualify here as a young person? I'm over 21 and I get called
> young by some posters here in email.
>
> ps
> Next time you reply to me maybe you could include at least a little of
> my post in your reply? I feel so snipped! LOL
Grant, I think it depends on how old the person doing the calling is.
To someone over 100, anyone under 60 is young. Not to mention alive!
LOL
I just noticed Morph's new reply to me in this thread. (I didn't see it
before my last post here.) Good for you to not read such junk.
Frankly, I never before sausage a load of cheesy whining boloney. I
don't know what ales the stout fellow, but it looks almost unbeerable.
It must have been fermenting inside him for years all bottled up,
causing him much sham pain. Poor guy, but at yeast he knows now
somebody rose to the occasion and actually read his post, before he
pops his cork. LOL
He said I was wrong about him not doing anything positive.
If he thinks his mean spirited sniping (trolling people who he thinks
are Y Not), opposing help posts with deliberate misinformation and
lies, disrupting the group, and looking like an anti- historical
hysterical crazy fanatic, is somehow positive, instead of negative, I'm
NOT going to let him rewire my house! LOL
Mover
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 |
|