On 16 Jan 2010 23:37:01 -0600, " +Grant. " <+Grant@grant.grant> wrote:
>I don't think it was a good idea to post this but we don't know how
>accurate the info is. The account holder could have lied about all or
>part of it when setting it up which is good policy if you want to
>access restricted google groups and aren't old enough.
Possibly.
>
>The 209 addresses are google servers. The 72 address bounces around the
>209 servers and ends in a major server with the name of
>"MX.UNOWNEDBAND.COM". Whatever that means.
>This is the first time I researched google addresses.
MX (Mail Exhanger Record) simply specifies how email should be routed
with the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP). They all belong to
Google's domain.
>
>
>Does 18 qualify here as a young person? I'm over 21 and I get called
>young by some posters here in email.
How MUCH over 21? Anyone under the age of 25 is considered 'young'.
>ps
>Next time you reply to me maybe you could include at least a little of
>my post in your reply? I feel so snipped! LOL
I'll be kind with the snipping next time ;).
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 |
|