I asked you to describe what qualities you'd seek in a paedophile hero
and what such a hero would have to do to defy the world and snatch
victory from it. What I got was a lot of invective and abuse. If I
were to take a few moments to remove the hatred and insults from your
post THIS is what you said:
>My concept has merit? thank you Doc, I feel better now with your
>recognisement!
>Your words denote the 'notable' excess of self esteem you have. I
>consider you quite stupid. Take that fact as the starting point of our
>argues, think about it as YOUR chance to change.
I'm all ears and eyes.
>You have been lucky to have grown your ego in a place so compliant with your reflections,
>but take my word that an environment with a higher IQ would have torn you
>to pieces long time ago.
Oh yeah, life is a breeze for me. Everything comes to me SO easily. I
never have a problem in the world. You have no idea how things are for
me. You're quick to assume things, but far be it for anyone else to do
so.
>And about me, well, I will remain in silence as long as I was able to
>control the repulsion that characters like you or your friend y-not inspire
>to me. It's spectacular anyway the big number of semireligious figures one
>has to meet and bear throughout life. At what point of our dear
>civilization did we reserve a place for all these frauds? They have the
>mouth full of 'jesus he loves me', being that assumption an abstraction of
>the true feeling: 'I love myself' -oftenly too much and oftenly with no
>discernment-. And through love, self love, is that they feel in position to
>believe that they are better than the rest, and therefore that they can
>correct anyone. And if they say 'I'm genuinely interested in your
>disagreement', they are meaning 'I'm professionally interested in
>correcting yourself'. Well, you are quite idiot and my english can be
>improved but you got the idea, didn't you?
I think you're saying that my interest in your point of view is
disingenuous. And you don't want to be preached to. Is that correct?
>Another sort points: You can't stand an offer if you have nothing to offer.
>My doubts are over your limits. I have not the lesser interest in 'enlighting' yourself?
>Yes the opposite, but not by you, obviously. And you question about the nature of
>my war at the same time that claim to be 'mine in boylove'.
Well, I've made no attempt to change your mind. I'm trying to get you
to speak yours. I'd like to understand the root of your rage.
>I'm not like you, so don't ever presume again to be like me.
That's easy because I have no idea what you're about. So far you have
been full of unfocused anger that you'd like to hurl at me.
>To begin with, I'm not an hypocrite with leadership illusions.
Can you explain in what way I'm a hypocrite? As for leadership
illusions, this is my philosophy: I am a rugged individualist. I know
what I want and what I believe in. I do what I think is right. Whether
people follow or not is not a matter of concern to me. If I believe
someone is wrong I speak my mind. If someone needs help, I generally
lend a hand. I'm not perfect and I don't strive for perfection. I do
my best.
>Besides, I
>can talk about exposition. I'm exposed to a world often hostile, and I do
>without a picture of my family in my pocket.
Perhaps that is a direct result of the way you approach the world. Why
does the fact that I'm a father bug you? I became a Dad before I
realized I was a boylover.
>Tell us, dear Doc, how many
>times did you hide yourself behind your marriage?
Never. You don't know, you can only assume. My wife knows I am a
boylover. My oldest son knows I am a boylover, my best friends know I
am a boylover, my parents know too. Are you more out of the closet
than me? I doubt it. Unless, of course, you were hauled before the
courts because of something you did to a child, then EVERYONE knows
about you being a pedophile, right? Have you voluntarliy admitted your
secret to anyone close to you?
>How many times did you
>hide your interest in boys behind a picture of your own children? Now tell
>me that you never approached to an anonymous boy and told him: 'I'm father
>of 2 little boys just like you...'
I don't approach anonymous boys. I smile at them from a respectful
distance. One time when I did help a boy in trouble I said, 'I know
I'm not your Dad, but I am a Dad; and nothing you could tell me would
surprise me.' I'm not a predator Uri. When I see a boy, my first
thought is not sexual. It is one of appreciation. In saying that I'm
not judging anyone, simply refuting your implications with the truth
about me.
>No, I'm not the fraud you are, I don't
>have such a useful mask as the one you allways wear.
That's an assumption I wouldn't make of another. How do you approach
an anonymous boy?
>'Pedohero' is disparaging, didn't you notice?
I thought it was clever invention. I wanted to be the first to say it.
>When Michael Jackson gave that famous interview he was near to be
>hero, he exposed his feelings just like they were, knowing the rejection
>he would rise. Lamentably, not even his fortune could isolate him from such
>an opposition. The pressure drove him to madness. He wanted to be a boy, to
>transform himself into a boy, the only image of beauty he ever knew. To
>hide his persona he bought a family like yours, my dear Doc. He bought your
>legitimate mask and Mark Lester' sperm all in the same packet, isn't it
>cool? And well, why all this peripheral deranged chatter? Oh yes, the hero.
>A hero is an executant of his own and true feelings, even when those
>feelings aren't shared by any other person in the world. The definition
>could approach the terms heroism and madness more than we wish, except for
>the own definition of 'truth' and 'true feelings'. Truth can be the same
>for everybody, and that's the key and my end.
I was about to be disappointed thinking that Michael Jackson was the
best you could do. But then you gave me a pseudo-definition of what a
pedophile hero would be to you.
It comes down to being true to yourself no matter what others think.
Right? I think what you described is the act of being noble. How does
a pedophile being true to himself defy the world and snatch victory
from it? I think the answer may lie in your usage of the word
executant. One who 'performs' his own true feelings. What does that
mean to you?
>Save your answer, I don't need it, do you need it?
No answer, only more questions. Earlier you disparaged me by saying
that I used so many words to say so little. I think the same applies
to you. Your answer is pretty lame. If you'd like to be a paedophile
hero you're going to need more than just your 'super insulting
powers'. That and a cool suit wouldn't even make you a comic book
hero. Heroes lead, and they need to give others a reason to follow. If
I'm all the BL world has for a hero, then as a group we're screwed,
right? So, why don't you REALLY speak your mind and lead rather than
bitch at others from the sidelines. You act like it's a piece of cake.
Here is the difference between you and me. I took a stance and support
it. I talk the talk and walk the walk. I'm out here taking bullets
form wannabes like you. You want the mantle? Come and take it. You
want to lead? Then step out front. Come out of the shadows proud
paedophile and be the point man. Lead, maybe I'll follow. Start your
revolution.
Otherwise shut the fuck up and quit whining.
Doc
>P.S. Isn't it fabulous the -notable again- number of deaths that devastate the 'boylover world'?
>How many, how many? Our boys are dying, how tragic! the devil couldn't wait another day to have those boys in his arms.
>Maybe our sperm is carrier of some kind of terrible curse, who knows, the list of tragic and early deaths is big enough to question ourselves.
>Duncan, Lloyd, a guy named Kolya, Kidhacker, the old Y-not, John the latin kid, a guy
>named MTB, Vladik... Jesuschrist, and the ingenuous boylovers believe,
>without reasonable doubt, anything that is said to them. Some people fake
>that they are children, some fake that they are moribund. It's a kind of
>lie very recurrent here, the boylover groups love drama. My oppinion is
>that neither boylovers nor lovedboys have a premature date with death, but
>in any case with lie. Take it the way you like.
I truly hope that Vladik isn't dead. I know you meant to be sarcastic,
but boys die too. If he is alive and well that would thrill me. He
gave us joy. Did he give you no joy? If he IS dead, it is a tragedy,
isn't it? The rate of death in the boylove world is the same rate of
death as in the general population. But we have fewer numbers and it
hits us harder. And yes, a lot of BLs are Drama Queens. Sometimes the
deaths are real, sometimes they are rumours. It is quite clear that
Duncan and Lloyd are alive.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
|