NP-f31 wrote in news:d8msd5pui7jppe3c7slluu1f8f0kscg0kn@4ax.com:
> On 18 Oct 2009 05:04:01 -0500, Uri <mail> wrote:
>
>
>>Dearissimo Doc, Tomba and whoever. How many words you americans use to
>>eventually say nothing.
>
> Hey Uri,
>
> I see little difference in the way I present my arguments to you as
> opposed to the way you present yours to me. With the notable exception
> that I tend to be more direct.
>
>>I'm afraid it must be another appendix of the
>>sensibility I was talking about and that finally is transforming this
>>forum into a words-hole. And what about your conversation request?
>>Could you think that I own that 'favor' to you or your group, this
>>refuge of compliant wankers? I don't think so, my time is limited and
>>I have the intention of taking profit from it.
>
> Well, I offered because I am genuinely interested in what you have to
> say. The offer still stands when you have the time to spare.
the offer?
>>Excuse then my refusal as much as my shadowed tone. You talk about
>>peace and I talk about war, our positions are irreconcilable. War is
>>what real pedos own to the world: war, though it hurts.
>
> You make an unclear distinction when you coin the phrase 'real pedos';
> as if one brand were more legitimate than another brand. But my
> interest is in understanding the nature of the war you owe to the
> world. Can you spare a moment to enlighten me?
>>The sweet sedative of places
>>like this can't help at all, and it should finish, unless we assume,
>>of course, that every paedophile is a well-off heterosexual like you.
>
> You make assumptions about me that indicate that you don't know mw as
> an individual or understand me as a person. I understand the
> ignorance, because we are strangers to one another, but your
> assumptions lead you to conclusions that are not based on my real
> circumstance. You appear to imply a class distinction between you and
> I that I neither recognize nor acknowledge. I love boys the same as
> you. Does the fact that I'm married and a father make me illegitimate
> as a boylover? If so, why?
>
>>So I frequently ask myself where are the heroes? Where are the people
>>who defied the world and took a victory from it? No one here, that's
>>true, but they must be somewhere, cause idols is what we need. Do I
>>have to become an idol to myself? Am I prepared? Real questions for my
>>real world, which is not as bucolic as a 'night at the stadium'?
>
> Your need for a hero is fascinating. I try to be self sufficient and
> self reliant. However, your concept has merit and I would love to know
> what qualities you'd seek in a paedophile hero. What would a pedohero
> need to do to defy the world and snatch victory from it? I have an
> idea of what you might say, but I will not prejudice my open mind.
> Please share your vision. I, promise you, I am not baiting you, I
> sincerely want to hear your point of view. Perhaps you can be an
> inspiration.
My concept has merit? thank you fucking Doc, I feel better now with your
recognisement!
Aren't you baiting me? thank you fucking Doc, I can stop crying then!
Your words denote the 'notable' excess of self esteem you have, but please
in the future, if you have to talk to me, remember the plain fact that I
consider you quite stupid. Take that fact as the starting point of our
argues, so the big fat esteem you have for yourself don't disturb too much
the vision you have about me or about our talking-to. And don't focus on my
hostility, think about it as YOUR chance to change. You have been lucky to
have grown your ego in a place so compliant with your absurd reflections,
but take my word that an environment with a higher IQ would have torn you
to pieces long time ago.
And about me, well, I will remain in silence as long as I was able to
control the repulsion that characters like you or your friend y-not inspire
to me. It's spectacular anyway the big number of semireligious figures one
has to meet and bear throughout life. At what point of our dear
civilization did we reserve a place for all these frauds? They have the
mouth full of 'jesus he loves me', being that assumption an abstraction of
the true feeling: 'I love myself' -oftenly too much and oftenly with no
discernment-. And through love, self love, is that they feel in position to
believe that they are better than the rest, and therefore that they can
correct anyone. And if they say 'I'm genuinely interested in your
disagreement', they are meaning 'I'm professionally interested in
correcting yourself'. Well, you are quite idiot and my english can be
improved but you got the idea, didn't you?
Another sort points:
-You can't stand an offer if you have nothing to offer. My doubts are over
your limits.
-I have not the lesser interest in 'enlighting' yourself? Yes the
opposite, but not by you, obviously. And you question about the nature of
my war at the same time that claim to be 'mine in boylove'. Fuck you and
your boylove.
-I'm not like you, so don't ever presume again to be like me. To begin
with, I'm not an hypocrite bastard with leadership illusions. Besides, I
can talk about exposition. I'm exposed to a world often hostile, and I do
without a picture of my family in my pocket. Tell us, dear Doc, how many
times did you hide yourself behind your marriage? How many times did you
hide your interest in boys behind a picture of your own children? Now tell
me that you never approached to an anonymous boy and told him: 'I'm father
of 2 little boys just like you...' No, I'm not the fraud you are, I don't
have such a useful mask as the one you allways wear.
-'Pedohero' is disparaging, didn't you notice, stupid 'open-minded' piece
of shit? When Michael Jackson gave that famous interview he was near to be
a hero, he exposed his feelings just like they were, knowing the rejection
he would rise. Lamentably, not even his fortune could isolate him from such
an opposition. The pressure drove him to madness. He wanted to be a boy, to
transform himself into a boy, the only image of beauty he ever knew. To
hide his persona he bought a family like yours, my dear Doc. He bought your
legitimate mask and Mark Lester' sperm all in the same packet, isn't it
cool? And well, why all this peripheral deranged chatter? Oh yes, the hero.
A hero is an executant of his own and true feelings, even when those
feelings aren't shared by any other person in the world. The definition
could approach the terms heroism and madness more than we wish, except for
the own definition of 'truth' and 'true feelings'. Truth can be the same
for everybody, and that's the key and my end.
Save your answer, I don't need it, do you need it?
P.S. Isn't it fabulous the -notable again- number of deaths that devastate
the 'boylover world'? How many, how many? Our boys are dying, how tragic!
the devil couldn't wait another day to have those boys in his arms. Maybe
our sperm is carrier of some kind of terrible curse, who knows, the list of
tragic and early deaths is big enough to question ourselves. Duncan, Lloyd,
a guy named Kolya, Kidhacker, the old Y-not, John the latin kid, a guy
named MTB, Vladik... Jesuschrist, and the ingenuous boylovers believe,
without reasonable doubt, anything that is said to them. Some people fake
that they are children, some fake that they are moribund. It's a kind of
lie very recurrent here, the boylover groups love drama. My oppinion is
that neither boylovers nor lovedboys have a premature date with death, but
in any case with lie. Take it the way you like.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|