In article <4ad9edef.109572973@127.0.0.1>, Ronin
<nesScitur@husShmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: yes
>
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:27:50 -0400, NP-f31 wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:53:26 -0700, "Fort Babysitter"
> > <FortBabySitter@AFP.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Babysitter,
>
> <snip>
>
> > Doc
> > NP-f31
>
> > PS- Think about how what you're doing looks to other people. What
> > you're doing is f*cked up.
>
> > PPS- Notice how I called YOU a racist without resorting to hate
> > language. Pretty effective, huh?
>
> O-Doc-san:
>
> I see, implicit in your comment, the assumption that this poster
> *cares* how other people may regard him. Suppose, instead, that
> his *sole* true objective is to coerce responses from others, by
> pulling whatever strings may advance that purpose -- ie, a power
> trip: is what and how he posts then more comprehensable?
>
>
> Ronin
>
Watt, a power trip? Don't take away his electricity! LOL
I agree he needs a realostat here and there, alternating with some
direct diodlogs, butt, there's nothing much that can be done to
rectumfy the situation he presents. LOL
Mover
|
|