NP-f31 wrote in news:lmjbd512j5sv2lhdled8jphfuasj59cnum@4ax.com:
> Path: news.astraweb.com!border1.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
> From: NP-f31
> Newsgroups: alt.fan.prettyboy
> Subject: Re: Friday Night Lights
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:39:03 -0400
> Message-ID: <lmjbd512j5sv2lhdled8jphfuasj59cnum@4ax.com>
> References: <8btvc51s9agfbk8vl9c9vus8hle3fm9kld@4ax.com>
> <4ad22804$0$320$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent
> 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 70
> Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
> NNTP-Posting-Host: eb3ed7d4.news.astraweb.com
> X-Trace:
> DXC=Mk9UiBYeM`L7dZd0V0aUXKL?0kYOcDh@JXb<8`kRh<;@MCf[SR?mPMMOPb\AA`0e:JB
> R2;XJHHP4LJ;A3SLYP:DNU]GM9EF@UkN
>
> On 11 Oct 2009 13:48:01 -0500, Uri <aga@d.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Uri,
>
> I'm having trouble understanding why you would find issue with my
> post.
>
>>Very idyllic story of posh boys and posh parents.
>
> Yes, I would agree. It was idyllic in the sense that such an
> experience as I enjoyed would be considered heavenly by anyone who
> loves boys.
>
> You appear to use the term 'posh' in a negative fashion, as if you'd
> bring social class into the conversation. I have had the same exact
> experience at a school that could easily be considered 'ghetto' here.
> I daresay my experience might be a universal one. Have you ever
> experienced such heightened sexuality at a High School futbol or rugby
> (or any sport) match where you live?
POSH: Port Outward, Starboard Home. In reference to British aristoocrats
that could buy preferred seating on early commercial sailling vessels.
I'd bet that most of the boys and their parents described even know the
difference between port and starboard, or why such a seating pattern is
preferred.
>
>>Idyllic and vulgar,
>>pretty suitable for the american sensibility.
>
> Can you explain to me what is vulgar about adolescents creating a mass
> sexual tension during a social gathering? I assure you their behavior
> was socially acceptable, but it was also truly fascinating.
Hmm... maybe because he missed out on this as a kid, and is ashamed to
acknolwdge it happenning as an adult. Therefore, it must be 'vulgar'
behavior.
>
>>The life of a pedophile is
>>not the life of a family man, would you consider it?.
>
> It's not a question of considering. I have no choice about my
> sexuality. Are you putting me down because I happen to be a father?
> Does that make me a bad guy? I am what I am and I do the best I can
> with the situation I am confronted with. It would be MUCH easier to be
> straight, but I am grateful that the Creator made me a boylover. It
> has given me a window into the world that few others enjoy.
Is the life of a pedophile and the life of a family man mutually
exclusive? It's not an either/or situation.
>
>>It explains however
>>your paternal attitude to the little and crazy group of people you
>>have here.
>
> Well, there ARE boys here. And being a Dad comes naturally to me. I
> don't take offense at being called paternal, even though you seem to
> wield the word as an insult. I have no defence for the crazy comment,
> because I suspect that many of us are crazy. At LEAST one of us is.
> However, there are likely more folks here than you suspect. Though
> neither of us can prove that point either way.
But we're all a "little crazy!"
>
>>Bad education for them, and quite annoying, I would say.
>
> If you find my experiences annoying I am puzzled as to the reason, but
> I consider that to be YOUR problem. As for the bad education point,
> could you elaborate on why or how the description of my experiences at
> a football game can be construed as a 'bad education'?
>
n interesting POV. I thought going to school sporting events was
recreation, not education. What would make it 'good education' for them?
Maybe straight jackets and leashes??
It's sad that Uri is annoyed at kids having a good time. Maybe he just
likes to be annoyed?
>>Of course
>>that your bitch y-not revere you and your attitude, cause somehow he
>>allways thought, like you, that he was better than the common pedos.
>
> I have no comment about him.
Way to hold your tounge, Doc! :) Who says you can't teach an old dog
stuff!
>
> I hope you'll write back. I am interested in other people's
> perceptions of themselves as boylovers or pedophiles. I would also
> like to better understand what it is about my worldview that seems to
> irritate you.
>
> Stay Safe,
>
> Doc
> NP-f31
>
Take care,
--
TomBa NP-f36
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|