In article <lmjbd512j5sv2lhdled8jphfuasj59cnum@4ax.com>, NP-f31 wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2009 13:48:01 -0500, Uri <aga@d.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Uri,
>
> I'm having trouble understanding why you would find issue with my
> post.
>
> >Very idyllic story of posh boys and posh parents.
>
> Yes, I would agree. It was idyllic in the sense that such an
> experience as I enjoyed would be considered heavenly by anyone who
> loves boys.
>
> You appear to use the term 'posh' in a negative fashion, as if you'd
> bring social class into the conversation. I have had the same exact
> experience at a school that could easily be considered 'ghetto' here.
> I daresay my experience might be a universal one. Have you ever
> experienced such heightened sexuality at a High School futbol or rugby
> (or any sport) match where you live?
>
> >Idyllic and vulgar,
> >pretty suitable for the american sensibility.
>
> Can you explain to me what is vulgar about adolescents creating a mass
> sexual tension during a social gathering? I assure you their behavior
> was socially acceptable, but it was also truly fascinating.
>
> >The life of a pedophile is
> >not the life of a family man, would you consider it?.
>
> It's not a question of considering. I have no choice about my
> sexuality. Are you putting me down because I happen to be a father?
> Does that make me a bad guy? I am what I am and I do the best I can
> with the situation I am confronted with. It would be MUCH easier to be
> straight, but I am grateful that the Creator made me a boylover. It
> has given me a window into the world that few others enjoy.
>
> >It explains however
> >your paternal attitude to the little and crazy group of people you have
> >here.
>
> Well, there ARE boys here. And being a Dad comes naturally to me. I
> don't take offense at being called paternal, even though you seem to
> wield the word as an insult. I have no defence for the crazy comment,
> because I suspect that many of us are crazy. At LEAST one of us is.
> However, there are likely more folks here than you suspect. Though
> neither of us can prove that point either way.
>
> >Bad education for them, and quite annoying, I would say.
>
> If you find my experiences annoying I am puzzled as to the reason, but
> I consider that to be YOUR problem. As for the bad education point,
> could you elaborate on why or how the description of my experiences at
> a football game can be construed as a 'bad education'?
>
> >Of course
> >that your bitch y-not revere you and your attitude, cause somehow he
> >allways thought, like you, that he was better than the common pedos.
>
> I have no comment about him.
>
> I hope you'll write back. I am interested in other people's
> perceptions of themselves as boylovers or pedophiles. I would also
> like to better understand what it is about my worldview that seems to
> irritate you.
>
> Stay Safe,
>
> Doc
> NP-f31
Lovely post.
I can't see anything to criticize or make fun of in a good way. That
annoys me! LOL
Mover
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|