In article <4ad3699b$0$271$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com>, Uri wrote:
> I well knew that the bitch of the fort wouldn't take long to show. It
> only took him a couple of hours to appear, few people is so...
> attentive. Aww well, would ever die this hydra of 100 faces? As soon as
> you have chopped one of his heads there is another one rising up from
> his body. Spectacular. He has more names than the same devil, but not
> enough however to support the huge list of lies he threw up along the
> years. The only comfort is to know that he is probably more sick than
> any other person here, shook by the hate that he himself inspired.
> Trapped by his past! Well, well, how sad and dramatic! And now the blush
> response.
>
> > His?
> >
> > Please define "common pedos".
>
> What's a pedo? I'm a pedo. You are not. But such a question deserves a
> book and not an answer. Worst yet if that answer is addressed to a louse
> like you.
"You are not." Here you expose yourself to be an irrational
sub-thinker, who creates his own lies so he can believe in them.
Evidence; You can know no more of me than what I post. I am a pedo. And
a BL. You said I wasn't, with no information to back up that statement.
The opposite in fact, as I had included myself among the pedos and BLs
in the second line of my post, but I'll excuse this from being a lie,
on the chance your ability with English isn't as skillful as you need
it to be to conduct cogent and coherent conversations here.
>
> > I'm asking, because I can't accurately define it myself.
> > I think you assume all "pedos" are just like you. We aren't. Some are
> > American. LOL
>
> What the hell should I reply to such a nonsense? Do you think I assume?
Yes.
> Don't think boy! Let thoughts for those who can bring them out.
This doesn't make sense. Bad English.
>
> > I see that "pedos" come in all shapes and sizes, work in all kinds of
> > occupations, and are just as stupid and just as intelligent as
> > everyone else. In other words, we are people who have different
> > sexuality than the majority, and have no other distinguishing
> > differences.
>
> What a stupid son of a bitch you are.
Here you reply with abuse. Is that because you are yourself as you
describe me, and can't think of anything useful and rational to
contribute to this dialog?
> I personally detest you and your
> cheap brainless demagogy.
Definition of "demagogy" is:
"a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires
and prejudices rather than by using rational argument."
The word is inappropriate to this situation. I have never been a leader
or do anything here but try to make some fun. YOU are not fun, so I'm
trying to help you. Can't you tell? LOL
> Well, spit what you want, asshole, but there
How nice. I don't ever want to see an asshole spit, but your words do
look like they're coming from there. So, don't sit down, or you can't
communicate! LOL
(I told you I would make fun of you. Thanks for making it so easy. LOL)
> is the terrible truth of living in a situation where your love and
> expression are tragically restricted.
Face it brother, most people never have all the love and expression
they want, not just us. Most of them, and us, don't wallow in self pity
over it.
> Then you know love, and as much as
> you know it, as much as you suffer.
Everyone suffers for love. That's life. If you don't like it, leave it.
Better that, than trying to drag everyone else down with you.
> That's what I call to live like an
> animal.
Human beings are the only animals who deny they are animals.
That's irony for you. Humans are funny about this, and would be more so
if the other animals could appreciate it. LOL
> Would you tell then than an animal is equal to a man, with no
> distinguishing differences?
No. I didn't say or imply that in my post.
And, I'm not in the habit of telling animals all that much of interest,
anyway. LOL
> I know the difference, and so do other
> people not impregnated by the group fable.
"Impregnated"? Each of us are going to give birth to children by
posting and reading posts here? Typing can be a labor, but this is
ridiculous! Where did you learn English?
There are no fables here, just different interpretations of history,
and lies people like you make up to attack.
> You probably don't know about
> it because you are just a farsant, a vulgar pretender. Expecting to see
> anyhing deep coming out from your mouth is like expecting to see a
> donkey talking about the economic crisis. Something similar happens with
> your friend, the family Doc. You can't teach what you can't understand.
"farsant" isn't an English word, so I can't be any kind of pretender,
or vulgar. In fact, it has been only you who have used vulgar words and
behaved in a vulgar way. Thank you for helping me to bring that to your
attention. LOL
If you can see something coming out of my mouth, you're very good,
because I'm not speaking at the moment, and we aren't even in the same
country. My webcam's off, too. LOL
I don't think Doc is my friend. In fact, I think he dislikes me. What
can we expect, when I criticize and make fun of him? He doesn't take
that lightly, and never forgets it. It's not my fault he practically
begs for my attention. LOL
>
> > Doc IS a family man, and has a wife and children. Why do you think
> > this is bad? He doesn't have sex with children,
>
> I bet that's the way you like pedos.
Not at all. I like people who are funny and smart. That's it. Sorry, I
doubt you would ever qualify. LOL
> so his sexuality
> > doesn't have anything to do with how he lives, works, and raises his
> > children, successfully. We in the fort know this because he's been
> > exposed here. We know his real name, where he works, and where he
>
> I will consider a visit to break his face. Are you in? I can break yours
> too with no extra charge.
No, I'm not in his face at the moment. LOL
I wouldn't mind seeing you try to break anything on Doc. Have someone
vidcam it. I want to see what happens to you, and which hospital you
grace with your presence. LOL
As for my face, well, okay, if you replace it with a better one. LOL
> > lives. There have been other BLs (pedos who don't hurt children) who
> > have posted here, who have been fathers. Good ones, I think. Why would
> > you deny them this, our human justification for existing, the most
> > important contribution we can make to the continuance and advancement
> > of our species? And the most personally rewarding? Jealousy?
>
> Of course I'm jealous. But who was talking about jealousy?
You just did. LOL
But in your previous post, jealousy was practically dripping out of my
monitor, it was so saturated with it. You should try reading your post
as if you had never seen it before. You might learn something.
> Sure not me,
> and if you judged that jealousy has something to do with my cause is
> just because you are a very low budget person.
"Budget"? What does money have anything to do with this? I'm not for
sale. We can discuss rental terms, however. LOL
> The most of the people is
> jealous of someone, and more people than one are jealous of me.
I'm not jealous. Why should I be? I'm not a child, to have such an
immature feeling. Are you?
> But tell
> me, why did you talk about fathership in such a way? "Human
> justification, the most important and personally rewarding
> contribution"? I'll reply my question. You did it because: 1, you are
> already a father (what fits with the farsant theory), and 2, because
> yes, you tried to offend me. How cool!
No, how warm!
I did nothing intended to offend you in my previous post. So, you have
created any offense from it by your own need to have it, to justify the
abuse in your reply. Can't you be honest about it?
I described fathership the way I did, because scientifically (in those
sciences I posted in my reply to Doc), and as reported by good fathers,
it is so. It's not my fault this reality offends you.
> But didn't you learn that I can't
> take offenses from somebody like you?
Who is like me but me?
Saying you can't take offense, and it being true, are not necessarily
the same. Your post says you did, with your vulgar language and false
accusations.
> What kind of person would I be?
Your post shows it. Read it and you should see, much better than anyone
can tell you. If you don't see yourself clearly then, read it as if
someone else had posted it to YOU.
> Instead of that, can you imagine how many people here will be offended?
> Because what you said is quite serious, and you just threw it like if it
> were nothing.
I didn't throw anything. I can now if you want, but can you catch it?
LOL
I posted as serious as you did. What did YOU throw?
> You can't tell me anything bad about myself that I hadn't
> thought myself earlier.
That's good. Then DO something about it. Being who you show you are,
can't be at all fun!
> The heart forged on a low flame. But there are
> people here much older than me who didn't have the chance to raise a
> boy, and you just told them that they let escape the most important
> reason to live. Do you see like you are a waste?
How could I be "a waste" (whatever that's supposed to mean) to others
for telling a well known truth to you to correct your abuse of another
poster? Can't you ever think of anyone but yourself, and the few people
who match how you think they are.
>
> > By definition, parents are paternal. Should we be surprised he brings
> > it here? LOL He could be worse, like depressed petulant you.
>
> Not everybody can be petulant. You never could.
You don't and can't know anything about that of me, so your statement
is useless. "Never" is a very inclusive word! Never use it. LOL
> And about depression is
> probably a state of mind very attached to the common pedo. But in the
> other hand you should consider the powerful laces between depression and
> happiness, as if they were made from the same substance better or worst
> calibrated.
No. I disagree. Happiness is the opposite of sadness; transitory
feelings. Depression is something else altogether. I suggest you get
help for that.
> Look at me,
No! Ugly! LOL
> I stand here as allways, and I can be more
> depressed than you,
Anybody can be more depressed than me, because I'm not depressed. LOL
I bet that depresses you. LOL
> and love more than you, and hate more than you, and
> sing, dance, fuck and cook with more passion than you'll ever have.
All of this you can never know, even if you lived with me, so you are
just being extraordinary stupid here.
> Because you are a moron. That's what depression have, it distinguish
> valuable people from morons like you.
More stupidity, and a little funny because of it.
If you are going to call someone bad names, you might try to be a
little credible with it by limiting them to the possible. No actual
"morons" have the ability or will to post here.
>
> > Doc posted what could be called a "slice of average suburban
> > middle-class life" in America, quite accurately. His interpretations
>
> And that's probably because your teens look so bad. I would call it a
> slice of average american social shit. But don't take it seriously, the
> most of my criticism is also applicable to the old and right-winded
> Europe.
Children, and adults, are more alike the world over, than some people
would like to admit.
>
> > of his observations were interesting, and on-topic for this newsgroup.
> > I see no justification for you to bring Y Not into this, or for you to
> > behave in this uncalled for derogatory manner.
>
> You look very sensitive to the references of your alter-ego.
No. I objected because there was no reason in Doc's post to mention
him. I don't care what you do with Y Not's name, I was just commenting
on your intention to inflame with it. I don't thinks that's bad in
itself, but you were not very smart with it there, and it just looked
stupid.
Y Not is not my altered ego. My ego is just fine being me. LOL
I'm not insulted in any way by being called Y Not. I just laugh at the
stupid people who do that, who don't have the brains to tell one poster
from another. LOL
> I thought
> he was dead! But hey, so many people are dying here in the groups,
> "boylovers" are probably the social entity with the most elevated
> mortality rate of the hole internet (if we don't count the y-not's
> online list of clients)
What list of clients? I never saw one posted.
It's sad when people die when they don't want to. We can't do anything
about it here.
>
> > Has life hurt you so
> > much, you need to see others hurt as well, to keep you company in your
> > misery?
>
> Implicating questions? Isn't that a well known formula from the multi-
> headed reptile?
I didn't know reptiles could ask questions. Do they speak to you often
when you visit the zoo? Do they ask you to free them? Do they like you,
or do you just make them hungry? LOL
What would be implicated by the obvious? I was just describing how you
looked in your post, for YOU to see, who didn't likely want to. The
form of the question is to encourage you to think. Are you unable to do
that?
> Oh yes, but too stupid anyway. Company? Of course I want
> company. "Friend, good", like old Frankie used to say. Nevertheless with
> the pass of time I learned to renounce 'day by day friends' as a hurtful
> but necessary part of my living, understanding that, like happens with
> other pure feelings, a conditioned friendship is not a true friendship.
> Did you have, like me, that urging necessity anytime of your life? Or
> could you hide like your friends behind the cozy shadow of a weeding
> ring? I'm not like you, my dear reptile, and I detest to lie to my loved
> people.
We all lie. Most of all, we lie to ourselves. If you want a friend, BE
a friend. Be sorry for the suffering of other people, and you will be
liked. Be sorry only for yourself, and not only you will dislike you.
>
> > I feel sorry for you, but that won't stop me from making fun
>
> You feel sorry but you want to make fun of me? Thanks for putting a line
> around your own hypocrisy
There is no hypocrisy there. I make fun of everybody and anything here
I can, so there is fun in the fort. Feeling sorry for who you want to
be, does't have any effect on that. You suffer, because you make
yourself suffer, because you want to suffer. Why, I don't really know,
but you don't HAVE to bring it here to try to make others feel as bad
as you do. I will make fun of you if I can, if you post things that are
not fun here.
> , that's the magic about the binomial sorrow-
> fun. Did you know the difference between a liar and hypocrite? The liar
> only lies to people, the hypocrite lies also to himself. You are
> pathetic, serioulsy.
Not seriously! LOL
I'm happy, with a good life, a good home, with good friends who accept
me as I am, who know I'm a BL. (Some of them are too.) If this makes me
pathetic, YOU must be too pathetic to exist!
>
> > of you in the future, if you do this again.
>
> Is that a menace? From you? Again?
No. Promise. Only the first. And I'm fulfilling it here. LOL
> Come on, old cunt, it's pity and not
> fear what I feel about you.
I'm afraid I don't fear any words here. LOL
> Please consider anyway, before you next and
> funny step, that it's not exactly the same being a joker than being a
> human living joke like you. Goodbye and emotionally yours!
We are all jokes. The real joke is on the people who don't know that.
LOL
>
> > Maybe Mover again. Or not. LOL
>
> this one goes with TM
>
>
> * I think our dear Doc, tutor of everybody, replied to me through the
> post of another person.
He didn't.
> Why would he need such a pretext?
Precisely! He doesn't. That should show you he didn't. If you had brain
power to add 2 and 2, you would know it. So, what did you say that
four? LOL
> Shuddered
> perhaps by the smell of a "familiar" corpse?
Your smeller isn't working correctly. Who nose why?
If you want to write to Doc, you should post to him. Don't you know how?
> I like the argues when they
> bring out the real stuff we have inside.
Your stuff above doesn't look good enough for sharing, but the next
part of your post is an improvement.
I did not defend Doc. He didn't need defending, I wouldn't do it
anyway. He doesn't deserve defending by me. I defended the truth in his
post, to someone who didn't understand his post, who needed to oppose
it.
> Candles, lollipops, pyjamas and
> puppies Doc, don't overlook your wife because so many boy! Remember the
> "advancement of our species". And watch the blood presure, you are not a
> boy anymore! Bytheway, I know people with more "sexual activity" on the
> wink of their eyes than all your posh boys together.
>
> * questioning myself, eating my magdalena, I came to consider that a
> common pedo is not eventyually attracted to women or men. But like it's
> not time to establish a line between true blood and mixed blood pedos, I
> can suggest other questions. An advance, from my own harvest. The
> society brought us the word paedophile, and lately focused over it a
> well known ammount of negative connotations related to abuse. The bright
> solution was to sieve the negative meanings with a new word: boylover.
> Boylover is a sweet word, phonetically weak, quite unpleasant to my
> ears, I must say. Who brought us such a term? I don't know. Who accepted
> it? I don't know neither, weak people probably. Cause would a brave
> person turn his back on his own reflection just for social demands?
> What's a pedo just a pedo can say, and I guess, my dear people, that it
> is something to think about. Now my thoughts go deeper with no reward,
> and the night forest awaits my arrival... bye, bye lyric lovers
>
>
If you are using a translating program, I suggest you try another. This
one is making most of your reading and writing look very mixed up in
English.
Mover
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|