I well knew that the bitch of the fort wouldn't take long to show. It
only took him a couple of hours to appear, few people is so...
attentive. Aww well, would ever die this hydra of 100 faces? As soon as
you have chopped one of his heads there is another one rising up from
his body. Spectacular. He has more names than the same devil, but not
enough however to support the huge list of lies he threw up along the
years. The only comfort is to know that he is probably more sick than
any other person here, shook by the hate that he himself inspired.
Trapped by his past! Well, well, how sad and dramatic! And now the blush
response.
> His?
>
> Please define "common pedos".
What's a pedo? I'm a pedo. You are not. But such a question deserves a
book and not an answer. Worst yet if that answer is addressed to a louse
like you.
> I'm asking, because I can't accurately define it myself.
> I think you assume all "pedos" are just like you. We aren't. Some are
> American. LOL
What the hell should I reply to such a nonsense? Do you think I assume?
Don't think boy! Let thoughts for those who can bring them out.
> I see that "pedos" come in all shapes and sizes, work in all kinds of
> occupations, and are just as stupid and just as intelligent as
> everyone else. In other words, we are people who have different
> sexuality than the majority, and have no other distinguishing
> differences.
What a stupid son of a bitch you are. I personally detest you and your
cheap brainless demagogy. Well, spit what you want, asshole, but there
is the terrible truth of living in a situation where your love and
expression are tragically restricted. Then you know love, and as much as
you know it, as much as you suffer. That's what I call to live like an
animal. Would you tell then than an animal is equal to a man, with no
distinguishing differences? I know the difference, and so do other
people not impregnated by the group fable. You probably don't know about
it because you are just a farsant, a vulgar pretender. Expecting to see
anyhing deep coming out from your mouth is like expecting to see a
donkey talking about the economic crisis. Something similar happens with
your friend, the family Doc. You can't teach what you can't understand.
> Doc IS a family man, and has a wife and children. Why do you think
> this is bad? He doesn't have sex with children,
I bet that's the way you like pedos.
so his sexuality
> doesn't have anything to do with how he lives, works, and raises his
> children, successfully. We in the fort know this because he's been
> exposed here. We know his real name, where he works, and where he
I will consider a visit to break his face. Are you in? I can break yours
too with no extra charge.
> lives. There have been other BLs (pedos who don't hurt children) who
> have posted here, who have been fathers. Good ones, I think. Why would
> you deny them this, our human justification for existing, the most
> important contribution we can make to the continuance and advancement
> of our species? And the most personally rewarding? Jealousy?
Of course I'm jealous. But who was talking about jealousy? Sure not me,
and if you judged that jealousy has something to do with my cause is
just because you are a very low budget person. The most of the people is
jealous of someone, and more people than one are jealous of me. But tell
me, why did you talk about fathership in such a way? "Human
justification, the most important and personally rewarding
contribution"? I'll reply my question. You did it because: 1, you are
already a father (what fits with the farsant theory), and 2, because
yes, you tried to offend me. How cool! But didn't you learn that I can't
take offenses from somebody like you? What kind of person would I be?
Instead of that, can you imagine how many people here will be offended?
Because what you said is quite serious, and you just threw it like if it
were nothing. You can't tell me anything bad about myself that I hadn't
thought myself earlier. The heart forged on a low flame. But there are
people here much older than me who didn't have the chance to raise a
boy, and you just told them that they let escape the most important
reason to live. Do you see like you are a waste?
> By definition, parents are paternal. Should we be surprised he brings
> it here? LOL He could be worse, like depressed petulant you.
Not everybody can be petulant. You never could. And about depression is
probably a state of mind very attached to the common pedo. But in the
other hand you should consider the powerful laces between depression and
happiness, as if they were made from the same substance better or worst
calibrated. Look at me, I stand here as allways, and I can be more
depressed than you, and love more than you, and hate more than you, and
sing, dance, fuck and cook with more passion than you'll ever have.
Because you are a moron. That's what depression have, it distinguish
valuable people from morons like you.
> Doc posted what could be called a "slice of average suburban
> middle-class life" in America, quite accurately. His interpretations
And that's probably because your teens look so bad. I would call it a
slice of average american social shit. But don't take it seriously, the
most of my criticism is also applicable to the old and right-winded
Europe.
> of his observations were interesting, and on-topic for this newsgroup.
> I see no justification for you to bring Y Not into this, or for you to
> behave in this uncalled for derogatory manner.
You look very sensitive to the references of your alter-ego. I thought
he was dead! But hey, so many people are dying here in the groups,
"boylovers" are probably the social entity with the most elevated
mortality rate of the hole internet (if we don't count the y-not's
online list of clients)
> Has life hurt you so
> much, you need to see others hurt as well, to keep you company in your
> misery?
Implicating questions? Isn't that a well known formula from the multi-
headed reptile? Oh yes, but too stupid anyway. Company? Of course I want
company. "Friend, good", like old Frankie used to say. Nevertheless with
the pass of time I learned to renounce 'day by day friends' as a hurtful
but necessary part of my living, understanding that, like happens with
other pure feelings, a conditioned friendship is not a true friendship.
Did you have, like me, that urging necessity anytime of your life? Or
could you hide like your friends behind the cozy shadow of a weeding
ring? I'm not like you, my dear reptile, and I detest to lie to my loved
people.
> I feel sorry for you, but that won't stop me from making fun
You feel sorry but you want to make fun of me? Thanks for putting a line
around your own hypocrisy, that's the magic about the binomial sorrow-
fun. Did you know the difference between a liar and hypocrite? The liar
only lies to people, the hypocrite lies also to himself. You are
pathetic, serioulsy.
> of you in the future, if you do this again.
Is that a menace? From you? Again? Come on, old cunt, it's pity and not
fear what I feel about you. Please consider anyway, before you next and
funny step, that it's not exactly the same being a joker than being a
human living joke like you. Goodbye and emotionally yours!
> Maybe Mover again. Or not. LOL
this one goes with TM
* I think our dear Doc, tutor of everybody, replied to me through the
post of another person. Why would he need such a pretext? Shuddered
perhaps by the smell of a "familiar" corpse? I like the argues when they
bring out the real stuff we have inside. Candles, lollipops, pyjamas and
puppies Doc, don't overlook your wife because so many boy! Remember the
"advancement of our species". And watch the blood presure, you are not a
boy anymore! Bytheway, I know people with more "sexual activity" on the
wink of their eyes than all your posh boys together.
* questioning myself, eating my magdalena, I came to consider that a
common pedo is not eventyually attracted to women or men. But like it's
not time to establish a line between true blood and mixed blood pedos, I
can suggest other questions. An advance, from my own harvest. The
society brought us the word paedophile, and lately focused over it a
well known ammount of negative connotations related to abuse. The bright
solution was to sieve the negative meanings with a new word: boylover.
Boylover is a sweet word, phonetically weak, quite unpleasant to my
ears, I must say. Who brought us such a term? I don't know. Who accepted
it? I don't know neither, weak people probably. Cause would a brave
person turn his back on his own reflection just for social demands?
What's a pedo just a pedo can say, and I guess, my dear people, that it
is something to think about. Now my thoughts go deeper with no reward,
and the night forest awaits my arrival... bye, bye lyric lovers
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
|