On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:18:48 -0700, "Fort Reporter" <Fort
Reporter@afp.com> wrote:
>FRAUD Doc NP-f31 Stupidity Counter
>======================================
>imgsrc.ru
>Counter at Doc NP-f31 posted directive to Fort
>274633
>
>imgsrc.ru
>Counter at Doc NP-f31 AFTER posted directive to Fort
>276650
>
> 276650
>- 274633
>=======
> 2017 views
>======================================
>Dutch boy birthday party
>
> This is one of our very top favorite photo galleries on
>imgsrc.ru. This high resolution photo gallery features
>seven Dutch boys at a very special birthday party.
>And with most of the Dutch boys being blond.
>
> If you haven't seen it before:
>
>CLICK here:
>http://imgsrc.ru/phanu/5573363.html?pwd=&lang=en
>
>======================================
Hi Kittens and everyone else that you have crammed inside your
splintered mind...
I'm not going to get into a pissing contest with you. I posted to warn
people about the dangers of clicking on hyperlinks. I also wanted to
warn them that the website you supplied a hyperlink to has been known
to host content that is illegal in many jurisdictions. I have no idea
if the photos you linked to are legal or not. But I'm not going to
risk MY security by following a link to a website that I know is being
monitored by LEA. Nor will I click on a link supplied by someone who
gets their internet service through the Phoenix, AZ Metropolitan
Police Department.
I don't care if a couple of thousand other people went there or not,
I'm not responsible for their safety, but I do feel an obligation to
warn newbies about the dangers of clicking on hyperlinks. I DO feel an
obligation to warn inexperienced boylovers about the dangers of
surfing naked (without proxies, re-routers or IP masking) on the
internet.
AND I'm not telling anyone else what to do, that was such a shallow
and obvious ploy. Not everyone is as stupid as you believe
George/Kittens/Abdul/Oden/etc.
Are you not concerned about the safety of newbies? Are you
uninterested in in helping to keep your fellow BLs safe? If you were,
then why would you attack someone who is trying to warn them about
"possible* dangers? Do you disagree that clicking on hyperlinks can be
dangerous? If so, state it plainly so that everyone judge for
themselves whom they want to believe.
But you will not answer George. You will deflect and name call. You
will try to redirect everyone's attention with lies and bluster. 'Pay
no attention to the man behind the curtain' you will say. 'Doc is a
moron, Doc is a fraud', you will say.
Answer the Question Officer Oden and prove me right.
Doc
NP-f31
'Official and Sanctioned Keeper of the Flame'
PS- I guess I did get into a pissing contest. LOL!
|
|