On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:13:12 -0500, insane for boys! <insane for
boys!> wrote:
>On 2009-07-19 00:57:49 -0500, insane for boys! <insane for boys!> said:
>
>> On 2009-07-18 23:13:02 -0500, Chad (NP-b24) said:
>>
>>> On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:43:15 -0700, "icicle" <icicle@NorthPole.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Truth Chad?
>>>>
>>>> <<>> What did YOU do when that old fart NP hit
>>>> on unsuspecting young boys with his phony 10-year-old nic?
>>>> 1. NP hitting on unsuspecting young boys that would
>>>> post text to him in the Fort?
>>>> 2. NP hitting on unsuspecting young boys that would
>>>> email NP to his posted email address?
>>>> 3. Did YOU think that these young boy hits were just
>>>> typical horny behavior for a ten-year-old boy lover?
>>>>
>>>> <<>> What did YOU do when that old fart NP was
>>>> questioned in the Fort regarding the veracity of his
>>>> bizarre aged nic? Did YOU defend his phony
>>>> 10-year-old age like you are doing now?
>>>>
>>>> <<>> What did YOU do when dodgeboy moved the
>>>> Fort away from that old fart NP with the phony
>>>> 10-year-old nic AND the Fort pet KidHacker?
>>>>
>>>> <<>> What did YOU do when that old fart NP with
>>>> the phony 10-year-old nic slunk into the back door of
>>>> the Fort (like a thief in the night) and stole all of those
>>>> JohnCarlos pics that Thylacine went to extraordinary
>>>> effort to obtain for the Fort, and where that old fart NP
>>>> with the phony 10-year-old nic posted them in Sworpville?
>>>>
>>>> <<>> What did YOU do after the death of NP with that
>>>> phony 10-year-old nic when KidHacker forged the deceased
>>>> old fart NP's nic on numerous occasions in the Fort?
>>>>
>>>> icicle
>>>>
>>>
>>> Excuse me, but I was here at the beginning. I don't recall you being
>>> here, unless you were simply a troll by some other nic back then. I
>>> don't consider myself to be overly gullible, save for the fact that I
>>> feel somehow compelled to reply to your drivel, but I had no reason at
>>> the time, nor do I now, to believe other than what I believe. Speaking
>>> from personal experience, I was sexually active - some might even say
>>> sexually hyperactive - prior to my ninth birthday. While my sexual
>>> promiscuity may have been somewhat uncommon at the time, I don't for a
>>> moment think that I am the only one who was either sexually active or
>>> at least thought about sex prior to reaching puberty. NP stole nothing
>>> with regards to the John and Carlos pics. As any common usenet user
>>> knows, once something is posted in a group, it become part of that
>>> group's public domain - free for all to download and repost elsewhere.
>>> That's really as much as I can respond to with regards to the post
>>> above simply because the rest of it makes no fucking sense whatsoever.
>>> My sincere suggestion would be that if you don't agree with the legend
>>> of the fort - most legends being based at least in part on fact - then
>>> you're more then welcome to go elsewhere.
>>>
>>> And that's the way it is... Walter Cronkite 1916 - 2009
>>>
>>> Chad (NP-b24)
>>
>> I would have LOVED to been your best friend before your 9th birthday! LOL :D
>
>I'm just curious. Was it with other boys or not? Also, why did it stop
>after your 9th birthday?
Yes, it was with other boys, and teen boys, and men. It didn't stop
after my ninth birthday - it started just before my ninth birthday. It
did slow down a bit by the time I turned 15.
Too bad we didn't know each other back then - coulda been fun! :-P
Chad (NP-b24)
|
|