On 24 May 2005 16:15:52 -0700, "the messenjah"
<theguyonthebike@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>
>
>Fred Hall wrote:
>> On 24 May 2005 16:05:18 -0700, "the messenjah"
>> <theguyonthebike@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Fred Hall wrote:
>> >> On 24 May 2005 15:56:46 -0700, "the messenjah"
>> >> <theguyonthebike@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Michael Cook wrote:
>> >> >> "Tom Bishop" <OneLeggedMan@InAnAssKickingContest.com> wrote in message
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >I asked:
>> >> >> >BullshitSnip<
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> better secure your sever...
>> >> >> why do you have yEnc encoded files of underage girls?
>> >> >> mdc
>> >> >
>> >> >sever
>> >>
>> >> Why am I not surprised that "underage girls" caught your attention,
>> >> PedoChuck?
>> >
>> >Why am I not surprised you'd think that?
>>
>> What else can I think about a pervert who posts poems describing baby
>> raping, followed by a link to a kiddie porn sight?
>>
>> Sick fuck.
>
>That's all you think about. Day after day. Are you going to call me
>again this evening?
Only if you promise to forward my call to your telco.
> I really get a kick out of your drunken voicemail
>messages. I've saved them. I think I'll post them here in this
>newsgroup.
Please do! Let's see what kind of faux Fred Hall messages you can
come up with, PedoChuck.
>
>"This is Fred Hall." "Pick up the phone, coward." "Fucking baby-raper."
>"Pansy-ass." That's my favorite one. You're fucking joke, Freddie.
I suppose being a joke is a few steps above a baby raper, doncha
think? Now chop chop, and start posting those Fred Hall messages,
PedoChuck.
>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Ya know
>> >> something? I should wait six days to respond to your inane comments.
>> >> That way, they'll be removed and there won't be anything to respond to.
>> >>
>> >> Chuck demonstrates his Usenet knowledge in Message-ID: <1108422620.509205.87110@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
|
|